[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390

Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-12 
20:39:52 UTC ---
No feedback in over a year so closing.

[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-07-26 21:16 ---
I fixed number of similar problems on Mozilla build recently. Can you, please,
re-try with current mainline? Otherwise we will need to get some testcase for
this.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390

[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[bero at arklinux dot org]

--- Comment #7 from bero at arklinux dot org  2010-06-03 11:38 ---
Exact same error with 4.5.1 branch rev. 160157, compiling trunk


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390

[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[bero at arklinux dot org]

--- Comment #1 from bero at arklinux dot org  2010-06-02 16:20 ---
uic3.tar.gz, containing the object files that should be linked and the source
they're generated from, is too large to attach, so I've uploaded it to
http://arklinux.org/~bero/uic3.tar.gz


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390

[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-02 16:27 ---
Can you try without -fwhole-program, with the tip of the 4.5 branch and with
trunk?  If it works on the trunk, can you identify the patch that made it work?


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390

[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr]

--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-06-02 16:35 ---
This looks like a duplicate of pr40873.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390

[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-02 16:36 ---
No, this is not fortran.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390

[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr]

--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-06-02 16:51 ---
 No, this is not fortran.

I am not sure that fortran matter here.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390

[Bug lto/44390] LTO strips out symbols that are actually needed

[bero at arklinux dot org]

--- Comment #6 from bero at arklinux dot org  2010-06-02 16:53 ---
Omitting -fwhole-program doesn't change anything. Compiling 4.5 branch and
trunk now.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44390