[Bug lto/62061] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302 cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_20100302_1.o link, -flto -fabi-version=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62061 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- The failure doesn't occur anymore, presumably fixed.
[Bug lto/62061] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302 cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_20100302_1.o link, -flto -fabi-version=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62061 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2014-08-21 CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||4.8.3 Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Summary|FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302 |[5 Regression] FAIL: |cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_ |g++.dg/lto/20100302 |20100302_1.o link, -flto|cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_ |-fabi-version=2 |20100302_1.o link, -flto ||-fabi-version=2 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail||5.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed on x86_64-linux with -fno-use-linker-plugin. Do you use a linker plugin on i?86-linux? Works with 4.8 on x86_64 with -fno-use-linker-plugin.
[Bug lto/62061] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302 cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_20100302_1.o link, -flto -fabi-version=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62061 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) Confirmed on x86_64-linux with -fno-use-linker-plugin. Do you use a linker plugin on i?86-linux? No, the system is RHEL 5.10 with binutils 2.17.50. These are too old for plugins.
[Bug lto/62061] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302 cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_20100302_1.o link, -flto -fabi-version=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62061 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Mine.