[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-12-14 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982

--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka  ---
On mainline this is now fixed by the transparent aliases patchset.  On release
branches I suggest going with the patch from Comment 4. I am moving back to
Prague right now, Markus, if you can put the testcase into the testuiste it
would be great. Any extra coverage of weakref is cool

[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-12-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|5.3 |5.4

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 5.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-12-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982

--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka  ---
I am testing:
Index: symtab.c
===
--- symtab.c(revision 231216)
+++ symtab.c(working copy)
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ symtab_node::get_partitioning_class (voi

   /* Weakref aliases are always duplicated.  */
   if (weakref)
-return SYMBOL_DUPLICATE;
+return definition ? SYMBOL_DUPLICATE : SYMBOL_EXTERNAL;

   /* External declarations are external.  */
   if (DECL_EXTERNAL (decl))

I probably should push out the early aliases patches.

[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-12-02 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982

--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf  ---
Honza?

[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-07-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982

Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
GCC 5.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone to 5.3.


[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-06-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982

Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2


[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-05-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982

Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |5.2


[Bug lto/65982] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:623

2015-05-03 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982

Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2015-05-03
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |hubicka at gcc dot 
gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mine.