[Bug lto/89084] [9 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.c:1892

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89084

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
integer function foo ( )
  write (*,*) 'foo'
  block
integer, parameter :: idxs(3) = (/ 1, 2, 3 /)
integer :: i
foo = 0
do i = 1, size(idxs)
  foo = foo + idxs(i)
enddo
  end block
end function foo

with -O0 and no -flto (with -O0 -flto ICEs) doesn't ICE, but has undefined
symbol like idxs.12345.  Strangely that goes away if the write statement is
removed.

[Bug lto/89084] [9 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.c:1892

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89084

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Started with r212467.

[Bug lto/89084] [9 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.c:1892

[dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89084

--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm  ---
Fails this assertion:

1892  gcc_checking_assert (vnode->definition);

(gdb) p vnode
$3 = 

[Bug lto/89084] [9 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.c:1892

[dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89084

David Malcolm  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2019-01-31
 CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm  ---
Confirmed (on godbolt with x86_64 trunk, and a regression relative to gcc 8.2)

[Bug lto/89084] [9 Regression] ICE in get_partitioning_class, at symtab.c:1892

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89084

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|--- |9.0