[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 > > --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- > It cannot be a duplicate: this bug was introduced much later than when > PR69482 was filed! It wasn't introduced - the present issue was exposed for this case ;-)
[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- It cannot be a duplicate: this bug was introduced much later than when PR69482 was filed! But glad the same patch seems to have fixed both, sure :-)
[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Yes, and I think it's a duplicate in the end. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 69482 ***
[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69482#c7 addresses the big issue here I think.
[Bug middle-end/108298] Wrong optimization of volatile access from gcc 11 and beyond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108298 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org, ||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- I think it started with r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2.
