[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-10-18 Thread robert dot nagy at gmail dot com


--- Comment #9 from robert dot nagy at gmail dot com  2006-10-18 22:06 
---
Hi.

I'd like to backport the fix of this problem  to OpenBSD because we still use
gcc 3.3 here and we are not able to compile OpenOffice w/o fixing this.
If someone can point me to the change you guys made I'd really appriciate it.

Thank you!


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826



[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-18 22:09 
---
(In reply to comment #9)
 If someone can point me to the change you guys made I'd really appriciate it.

There have been too many changes to figure out what fixed this really and 3.3
is no longer being maintained by us.  What most likely happened here is
something changed the rtl which worked around the problem of the instruction
scheduler blowing up.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826



[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-09-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-21 20:24 ---
No working test case, no feedback for two months - no reason to keep this
open.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826



[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-09-21 Thread dwmw2 at infradead dot org


--- Comment #8 from dwmw2 at infradead dot org  2006-09-21 20:38 ---
Apologies -- GCC bugzilla mail was going missing due to being sent with a bogus
sender address. Will dig out a current test case if it's still an issue.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826



[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-07-22 Thread echristo at apple dot com


--- Comment #6 from echristo at apple dot com  2006-07-22 21:16 ---
Waiting on David's feedback.


-- 

echristo at apple dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826



[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-07-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-10 12:19 ---
It doesn't compile with 4.1 either due to errors.  Can you re-do preprocessed
source for 4.1 and possibly mainline?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826



[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-07-05 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826



[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-06-04 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|4.0 regression: excessive   |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
   |compiler resource usage |excessive compiler resource
   ||usage
   Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826



[Bug middle-end/20826] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] excessive compiler resource usage

2006-06-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-04 20:02 ---
This was a P2 before P3 was default.  Also I mentioned this was much improved
on the mainline which might mean this was fixed but I don't have a place to
test it 


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P2  |P3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20826