[Bug middle-end/39883] preprocessor fails with myassertion

2010-04-28 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE


--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-04-28 
18:00 ---
Subject: Re:  preprocessor fails with myassertion

 --- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-23 22:43 
 ---
 This one appears to have fallen through the cracks. Reported exactly one year
 ago, and now accidentally shows up in my search because my brain believed we
 still live in 2009... Oh well.

I'll try to go through the Solaris bugs in the near future, but have
concentrated on getting the 4.5 release in shape until now.

 Rainer, could you see if you can confirm this one (with 4.4/4.5/trunk)?

I don't have a 4.4 tree around at the moment, but the testcase works
fine on both 4.5 and mainline *with a sparc-sun-solaris2.10* compiler.
The problem might be related to the sparc64-sun-solaris2.8
configuration, but I refuse to test that because I simply don't have the
manpower to double testing effort when a 32-bit default bi-arch compiler
handles this just fine.  I'd rather remove the sparcv9-sun-solaris2.*
configuration than deal with this.

 Could the warning: GMP header version 4.3 differs from library version 
 4.3.0.
 have something to do with the segfault?

I doubt that, actually, though I haven't checked GMP versioning in
detail.

Maybe Eric has a sparcv9 compiler around and can easily check this?

Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39883



[Bug middle-end/39883] preprocessor fails with myassertion

2010-04-28 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-28 18:46 
---
 I'll try to go through the Solaris bugs in the near future, but have
 concentrated on getting the 4.5 release in shape until now.

I totally missed it as well...

 Maybe Eric has a sparcv9 compiler around and can easily check this?

I only have 4.3.5, 4.5.1 and 4.6.0 compilers for sparc64-sun-solaris2.x at the
moment, I'll test if someone can attach the preprocessed source.  The submitter
said that the problem has disappeared so the PR can be closed though.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39883



[Bug middle-end/39883] preprocessor fails with myassertion

2010-04-28 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE


--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-04-28 
19:30 ---
Subject: Re:  preprocessor fails with myassertion

 Maybe Eric has a sparcv9 compiler around and can easily check this?

 I only have 4.3.5, 4.5.1 and 4.6.0 compilers for sparc64-sun-solaris2.x at the
 moment, I'll test if someone can attach the preprocessed source.  The 
 submitter
 said that the problem has disappeared so the PR can be closed though.

Preprocessed source is embedded in the original submission.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39883



[Bug middle-end/39883] preprocessor fails with myassertion

2010-04-28 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-28 19:41 
---
 Preprocessed source is embedded in the original submission.

Yes, that's precisely why I asked to attach it instead.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39883



[Bug middle-end/39883] preprocessor fails with myassertion

2010-04-28 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-28 19:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=20509)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20509action=view)
preprocessed test case, copied from comment #0


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39883



[Bug middle-end/39883] preprocessor fails with myassertion

2010-04-28 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-28 22:31 
---
Thanks, Steven.

So, one year later, ...


-- 

ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
  Known to fail||4.4.0
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-28 22:31:37
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39883



[Bug middle-end/39883] preprocessor fails with myassertion

2010-04-26 Thread Denis dot Excoffier at airbus dot com


--- Comment #2 from Denis dot Excoffier at airbus dot com  2010-04-26 09:58 
---
I tried this morning to reproduce this bug with GCC 4.4.3 and GCC 4.5.0 and i
didn't succeed (that is: the GCC 4.4.0 bug is gone).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39883



[Bug middle-end/39883] preprocessor fails with myassertion

2010-04-23 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-23 22:43 ---
This one appears to have fallen through the cracks. Reported exactly one year
ago, and now accidentally shows up in my search because my brain believed we
still live in 2009... Oh well.

I tried to reproduce this with a GCC 4.4.2 cross-compiler from x86_64-linux to
sparc64-sun-solaris2.8:
Reading specs from ./specs
Target: sparc64-sun-solaris2.8
Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.2/configure --enable-languages=c --with-mpc=/opt/
--disable-bootstrap --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp
--target=sparc64-sun-solaris2.8
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.2 (GCC) 
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-B.' '-S' '-mcpu=v9' '-fpreprocessed' '-v'
 ./cc1 -fpreprocessed scannerapi.i -quiet -dumpbase scannerapi.i -mcpu=v9
-auxbase scannerapi -version -fpreprocessed -o scannerapi.s
GNU C (GCC) version 4.4.2 (sparc64-sun-solaris2.8)
compiled by GNU C version 4.4.1, GMP version 4.3.1, MPFR version
2.4.1-p2.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
Compiler executable checksum: 8f402920727a69779efab15585e5a4c9
COMPILER_PATH=./
LIBRARY_PATH=./
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-B.' '-S' '-mcpu=v9' '-fpreprocessed' '-v'


Rainer, could you see if you can confirm this one (with 4.4/4.5/trunk)?
Could the warning: GMP header version 4.3 differs from library version 4.3.0.
have something to do with the segfault?


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ro at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39883