[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-10-21 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se 


--- Comment #11 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se  2009-10-21 10:51 ---
*** Bug 40547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

mikpe at it dot uu dot se changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mikpe at it dot uu dot se


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747

[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-07-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 11:26 ---
Fixed.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747

[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-07-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 11:23 ---
Subject: Bug 40747

Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jul 15 11:23:22 2009
New Revision: 149681

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149681
Log:
PR middle-end/40747
* fold-const.c (fold_cond_expr_with_comparison): When folding
< and <= to MIN, make sure the MIN uses the same type as the
comparison's operands.

* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr40747.c: New test.

Added:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr40747.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/fold-const.c
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747

[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-07-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 10:18 ---
Subject: Bug 40747

Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jul 15 10:17:54 2009
New Revision: 149675

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149675
Log:
PR middle-end/40747
* fold-const.c (fold_cond_expr_with_comparison): When folding
< and <= to MIN, make sure the MIN uses the same type as the
comparison's operands.

* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr40747.c: New test.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr40747.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747

[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-07-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 09:48 ---
Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg00842.html


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
   ||patches/2009-
   ||07/msg00842.html


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747

[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-07-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747

[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-07-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 08:28 ---
I'm already bootstrapping/regtesting a fix, will post afterwards.
If it gets approved quickly, I'll include it in 4.4.1-rc1 I plan to roll today.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.4.2   |4.4.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747

[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-07-15 Thread sezeroz at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #5 from sezeroz at gmail dot com  2009-07-15 08:19 ---
This bug may result in unreliable binary outputs, why is it targeted for fixing
in 4.4.2 and not in 4.4.1?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747

[Bug middle-end/40747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong code for int-is-in-range test at -O1 and above

2009-07-15 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40747