[Bug middle-end/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

[jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk]

--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2010-04-19 07:52 ---
small enough for pasting:

 cat bug.f90
MODULE fft_tools
  INTEGER, PARAMETER :: sp=4, dp=8
  INTEGER, PARAMETER :: lp = dp
CONTAINS
  SUBROUTINE sparse_alltoall ( rs, scount, sreq, rq, rcount, rreq, group )
COMPLEX(KIND=lp), DIMENSION(:, :), 
  POINTER:: rs
COMPLEX(KIND=lp), DIMENSION(:, :), 
  POINTER:: rq
IF ( rcount(pos) /= 0 ) THEN
   rq(1:rcount(pos),pos) = rs(1:rcount(pos),pos)
END IF
  END SUBROUTINE sparse_alltoall
END MODULE fft_tools


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43793

[Bug middle-end/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

[dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr]

--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-04-19 08:52 ---
Confirmed, probably introduced/uncovered between revisions 158215 (no ICE) and
158486 (ICE).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43793

[Bug middle-end/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

[jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk]

--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2010-04-19 09:23 ---
Dominique, you should ask for 'bugzilla confirmation rights' which will allow
to touch the 'Confirm' fields etc...


-- 

jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
  Known to fail||4.6.0
  Known to work||4.5.0
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-04-19 09:23:45
   date||
   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43793

[Bug middle-end/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

[dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr]

--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-04-19 09:30 ---
 Dominique, you should ask for 'bug zilla confirmation rights' which will allow
 to touch the 'Confirm' fields etc...

Do you WHO I should ask for 'bug zilla confirmation rights'?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43793

[Bug middle-end/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-19 09:50 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
  Dominique, you should ask for 'bug zilla confirmation rights' which will 
  allow
  to touch the 'Confirm' fields etc...
 
 Do you WHO I should ask for 'bug zilla confirmation rights'?

If you have svn write access you have full bugzilla rights if you use
a bugzilla account with your @gcc.gnu.org address.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43793

[Bug middle-end/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

[dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr]

--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2010-04-19 09:56 ---
 If you have svn write access you have full bugzilla rights if you use
 a bugzilla account with your @gcc.gnu.org address.

Indeed I don't have svn write access and I am not planning to ask for it in a
near future. Is there other ways to 'bugzilla confirmation rights'?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43793

[Bug middle-end/43793] [4.6 Regression] tree check: expected tree that contains �decl minimal� structure, have �indirect_ref� in gfc_trans_array_bound_check

[jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk]

--- Comment #7 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2010-04-19 11:56 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
  If you have svn write access you have full bugzilla rights if you use
  a bugzilla account with your @gcc.gnu.org address.
 
 Indeed I don't have svn write access and I am not planning to ask for it in 
 a
 near future. Is there other ways to 'bugzilla confirmation rights'?
 

Nor do I have svn write access (afaik), but I can confirm/close/etc bugs. I
think this was something tobias burnus enabled? 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43793