[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #20 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-11 10:21 --- also on i686-darwin9, closing as fixed. -- iains at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #18 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-06 11:08 --- AFAICT this pr seems to have been fixed between revisions 162881 (fail) and 162920 (OK) at least on x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0 (-m32 and -m64) and powerpc-apple-darwin9 (-m32, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-08/msg00530.html ). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #19 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-06 12:48 --- From IRC: martinj dominiq: r162911 and r162912 ...and no other recent change seems relevant martinj dominiq: whether the bug is fixed or just hidden, I can't really tell at the moment -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at suse dot cz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #17 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-07-29 11:15 --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10, these failures at -m32 and -m64 appear to be suppressed when building with --enable-checking=release and reappear when building with --enable-checking=yes. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg02700.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-07-29 11:28:28 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:53 --- This seems fixed? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #16 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 13:15 --- (In reply to comment #15) This seems fixed? well certainly not for 32 bit versions: as of r162456 (i686) just tested locally and... ... ppc (162433) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg02130.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #13 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-11 00:25 --- this is still present, AFAICT, for *-*-darwin* at r162047. Honza, since it was your patch that triggered this, any ideas on what we could do to debug/solve this one? in particular this; error: Inline clone with address taken is still happening. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-11 04:58 --- *** Bug 44590 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens dot ||fr http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #12 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:25 --- The failure in comment #1 might be related to PR 44206. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 19:10 --- Seems pretty obvious to me that this is *not* a libstdc++ issue. I'm tentatively categorizing it as middle-end and adding Honza due to Comment #2. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Component|libstdc++ |middle-end http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 19:12 --- HJ, can you pin point the regressing revision? Thanks. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot ||com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 19:23 --- libstdc++ tests are clean on Linux/ia32 as of revision 159368: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg01212.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #5 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 19:41 --- (In reply to comment #4) libstdc++ tests are clean on Linux/ia32 as of revision 159368: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg01212.html fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 last pass from regress: Date: 2010-05-12T18:51:16Z Revision: 159338 -- iains at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet|i686-apple-darwin9 |*-apple-darwin9 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 20:07 --- What is the first revision failed on darwin? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 20:25 --- Yes, we need the help of people running darwin, on x86_64-linux (-m64) too the problem cannot be reproduced. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #8 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 20:31 --- (In reply to comment #7) Yes, we need the help of people running darwin, on x86_64-linux (-m64) too the problem cannot be reproduced. I've just built a reghunt tree ;-) starting a successive approx. @159348 ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 20:57 --- Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #10 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 21:59 --- (In reply to comment #9) Thanks. between 159348 and 159356 will try and refine - but those changes look kinda connected -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
[Bug middle-end/44121] [4.6 Regression] multiple char-related fails.
--- Comment #11 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 22:52 --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) Thanks. between 159348 and 159356 will try and refine - but those changes look kinda connected looks like it is 159354. 159353 is OK and the logs for the other changes look unrelated. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
