[Bug middle-end/45416] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Code size regression from 4.4 for ARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.7.0 --- Comment #17 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-01 14:47:09 UTC --- fixed. Not a wrong-code bug, so not backporting.
[Bug middle-end/45416] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Code size regression from 4.4 for ARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416 --- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23 17:59:56 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Mon Jan 23 17:59:51 2012 New Revision: 183446 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=183446 Log: 2012-01-23 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org PR middle-end/45416 * gcc.dg/pr45416.c: Skip if Thumb1. Handle ubfx. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr45416.c
[Bug middle-end/45416] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Code size regression from 4.4 for ARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.weddington at atmel ||dot com, gjl at gcc dot ||gnu.org --- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-09 13:01:39 UTC --- Appears that the patch leads to code bloat on AVR at least. It is general wrong to assume that it's cheap to perform x n without caring for the underlying architecture.