http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55283
Bug #: 55283 Summary: EON performance regression at -O2 due to loop unrolling changes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: hubi...@gcc.gnu.org EON regressed by about 20% at -O2 due to 2012-11-06 Jan Hubicka <j...@suse.cz> * cfgloopanal.c (get_loop_hot_path): New function. * tree-ssa-lop-ivcanon.c (struct loop_size): Add CONSTANT_IV, NUM_NON_PURE_CALLS_ON_HOT_PATH, NUM_PURE_CALLS_ON_HOT_PATH, NUM_BRANCHES_ON_HOT_PATH. (tree_estimate_loop_size): Compute the new values. (try_unroll_loop_completely): Disable unrolling of loops with only calls or too many branches. (tree_unroll_loops_completely): Deal also with outer loops of hot loops. * cfgloop.h (get_loop_hot_path): Declare. * params.def (PARAM_MAX_PEEL_BRANCHES): New parameters. * invoke.texi (max-peel-branches): Document. This seems to be bad cost model on array accesses because we unroll only for size at -O2