[Bug other/112836] gcc fails when job control is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112836
--- Comment #5 from Bruno Haible ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #4)
> I tried this patch but it does not address the issue with posix_spawn that I
> am seeing.
>
> Trying to build gcc from git on Linux sparc64 with glibc 2.37 with the
> following configuration:
>
> ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib
> --disable-nls --host=sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
>
> fails with:
>
> xgcc: fatal error: cannot execute '/home/glaubitz/gcc/build/./gcc/cc1plus':
> posix_spawn: Bad address
> compilation terminated.
>
> This can be worked around when building with one parallel job (make -j1).
This appears to be a different bug, because
- it appears under different conditions (parallel make, not Ctrl-Z / 'fg'),
- the message is different ("posix_spawn: Bad address", not "failed to get
exit status: Interrupted system call").
Could you please register it as a separate bug under
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ ?
[Bug other/112836] gcc fails when job control is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112836 --- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- I tried this patch but it does not address the issue with posix_spawn that I am seeing. Trying to build gcc from git on Linux sparc64 with glibc 2.37 with the following configuration: ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib --disable-nls --host=sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu fails with: xgcc: fatal error: cannot execute '/home/glaubitz/gcc/build/./gcc/cc1plus': posix_spawn: Bad address compilation terminated. This can be worked around when building with one parallel job (make -j1).
[Bug other/112836] gcc fails when job control is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112836 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-04 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Can you post it to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org please?
[Bug other/112836] gcc fails when job control is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112836 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Thanks for chasing this down. This has been driving me nuts for a while but I hadn't dug into it yet.
