[Bug other/21350] configure reports only a warning when bison is not installed

2005-05-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-03 
14:45 ---
Are you building from the source tarball or from CVS?
If from the source tarball, you don't need bison which is why it is just a 
warning.
Otherwise this is a bug in the release process if bison is now required (and a 
regression).
What is the current error you are getting building GCC?

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350


Re: [Bug other/21350] configure reports only a warning when bison is not installed

2005-05-03 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

| Are you building from the source tarball or from CVS?
| If from the source tarball, you don't need bison which is why it is just a 
warning.
| Otherwise this is a bug in the release process if bison is now required (and 
a regression).
| What is the current error you are getting building GCC?

The problem as I was able to reproduce on Peter's machine yesterday is
the following: gcc-core from release repository does not seem to
contain w pregenerated c-parse.c.  At build time, the build machiery
attempts to generate it from c-parse.in and was looking for bison
which Peter did not have. For some reasons the build did not stop for
clear and unambiguous reason, (and even sooner aat configure time).  

If we now require bison for gcc-core, then we should check that at
configure time and abort.

-- Gaby


[Bug other/21350] configure reports only a warning when bison is not installed

2005-05-03 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  
2005-05-03 15:24 ---
Subject: Re:  configure reports only a warning when bison is not installed

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

| Are you building from the source tarball or from CVS?
| If from the source tarball, you don't need bison which is why it is just a 
warning.
| Otherwise this is a bug in the release process if bison is now required (and 
a regression).
| What is the current error you are getting building GCC?

The problem as I was able to reproduce on Peter's machine yesterday is
the following: gcc-core from release repository does not seem to
contain w pregenerated c-parse.c.  At build time, the build machiery
attempts to generate it from c-parse.in and was looking for bison
which Peter did not have. For some reasons the build did not stop for
clear and unambiguous reason, (and even sooner aat configure time).  

If we now require bison for gcc-core, then we should check that at
configure time and abort.

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350


[Bug other/21350] configure reports only a warning when bison is not installed

2005-05-02 Thread peter dot pirkelbauer at tamu dot edu

--- Additional Comments From peter dot pirkelbauer at tamu dot edu  
2005-05-03 02:33 ---
automake 1.9
autoconf 2.59a

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

   GCC host triplet||linux 2.6.10


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350