[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2011-01-05 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #22 from Rob rob1weld at aol dot com 2011-01-05 16:26:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
 At long last.
It was only 2 years... I have some older than that.

Thank you for your work on my Bug Report,
Rob


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2011-01-04 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 
23:18:15 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan  4 23:18:12 2011
New Revision: 168490

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168490
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (end_directive): Call _cpp_remove_overlay for deferred
pragmas as well in traditional mode.

Modified:
trunk/libcpp/ChangeLog
trunk/libcpp/directives.c


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2011-01-04 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 
23:18:55 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan  4 23:18:52 2011
New Revision: 168492

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168492
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (end_directive): Call _cpp_remove_overlay for deferred
pragmas as well in traditional mode.

Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/libcpp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/libcpp/directives.c


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2011-01-04 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 
23:18:32 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan  4 23:18:29 2011
New Revision: 168491

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168491
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (end_directive): Call _cpp_remove_overlay for deferred
pragmas as well in traditional mode.

Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libcpp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libcpp/directives.c


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2011-01-04 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|4.6.0   |4.4.6

--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-04 
23:20:15 UTC ---
At long last.


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-12-18 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-18 
17:35:48 UTC ---
 I wonder if this wouldn't fix it (at least, that's similar to how lex.c guards
 calling of _cpp_process_line_notes).  I can't reproduce it myself, so have to
 guess...

The problem is that #pragma redefine_extname breaks the balance of calls to
_cpp_overlay_buffer and _cpp_remove_overlay:

Breakpoint 1, _cpp_overlay_buffer (pfile=0x104705160,
start=0x104714050 
redefine_extname\tmkstemp64\tmkstemp\nE64_SOURCE)\nLONG)\n (3 - 0 =
4))\nNned(_XOPEN_SOURCE)) || \t\tdefined(_KERNEL) || defined(_KMEMUSER) ||
\t\tdefined(__EXTENSIONS__)\n, len=35)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/traditional.c:269
269   cpp_buffer *buffer = pfile-buffer;
(gdb) p pfile-overlaid_buffer
$3 = (cpp_buffer *) 0x0
(gdb) continue
Continuing.

Breakpoint 1, _cpp_overlay_buffer (pfile=0x104705160,
start=0x104714050 \t
\nseemp64\tmkstemp\nkstemp64\tmkstemp\nE64_SOURCE)\nLONG)\n (3 - 0 =
4))\nNned(_XOPEN_SOURCE)) || \t\tdefined(_KERNEL) || defined(_KMEMUSER) ||
\t\tdefined(__EXTENSIONS__)\n, len=2)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/traditional.c:269
269   cpp_buffer *buffer = pfile-buffer;
(gdb) p pfile-overlaid_buffer
$4 = (cpp_buffer *) 0x10470ad98

because in_deferred_pragma is true in:

/* Called when leaving a directive, _Pragma or command-line directive.  */
static void
end_directive (cpp_reader *pfile, int skip_line)
{
  if (pfile-state.in_deferred_pragma)
;
  else if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, traditional))
{
  /* Revert change of prepare_directive_trad.  */
  pfile-state.prevent_expansion--;

  if (pfile-directive != dtable[T_DEFINE])
_cpp_remove_overlay (pfile);
}

It is only reset to false in _cpp_lex_direct but this is apparently too late to
call _cpp_remove_overlay from there:

Index: lex.c
===
--- lex.c   (revision 167901)
+++ lex.c   (working copy)
@@ -1944,6 +1944,8 @@ _cpp_lex_direct (cpp_reader *pfile)
  pfile-state.in_deferred_pragma = false;
  if (!pfile-state.pragma_allow_expansion)
pfile-state.prevent_expansion--;
+ if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, traditional))
+   _cpp_remove_overlay (pfile);
  return result;
}
   if (!_cpp_get_fresh_line (pfile))

yields a SIGSEGV in _cpp_remove_overlay.  The obvious change to end_directive
seems to work though, revised patch to be attached.


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-12-18 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #22795|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-18 
17:37:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 22812
  -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22812
Revised patch

It passes the cpp.exp and trad.exp testsuites on 2 platforms.


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-12-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-17 
10:46:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 22795
  -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22795
gcc46-pr39213.patch

I wonder if this wouldn't fix it (at least, that's similar to how lex.c guards
calling of _cpp_process_line_notes).  I can't reproduce it myself, so have to
guess...


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-11-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-29 
08:41:06 UTC ---
Tom, what's the best approach to fixing this?


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-11-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 
11:44:22 UTC ---
Backtrace with Rainer's testcase on SPARC/Solaris 32-bit:

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0xff3201cc in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
(gdb) bt
#0  0xff3201cc in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
#1  0xff2b594c in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
#2  0x008607d8 in _cpp_process_line_notes (pfile=0xaa3568, in_comment=0)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/lex.c:871
#3  0x00869370 in _cpp_scan_out_logical_line (pfile=0xaa3568, macro=0x0)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/traditional.c:384
#4  0x00869fb4 in _cpp_read_logical_line_trad (pfile=0xaa3568)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/traditional.c:306
#5  0x0010aef0 in scan_translation_unit_trad (pfile=0xaa3568)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/c-family/c-ppoutput.c:288
#6  preprocess_file (pfile=0xaa3568)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/c-family/c-ppoutput.c:94
#7  0x00107618 in c_common_init ()
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1051
#8  0x000ae7c4 in c_objc_common_init ()
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/c-objc-common.c:64
#9  0x00481bb0 in lang_dependent_init (argc=5, argv=0xffbefbcc)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/toplev.c:2184
#10 do_compile (argc=5, argv=0xffbefbcc)
at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/toplev.c:2315


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-11-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tromey at redhat dot com

--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-24 
12:35:18 UTC ---
add_line_note adds a sentinel note

 done:
  *d = '\n';
  /* A sentinel note that should never be processed.  */
  add_line_note (buffer, d + 1, '\n');
  buffer-next_line = s + 1;

then _cpp_overlay_buffer changes buffer-cur and the test at the beginning of
_cpp_process_line_notes

  if (note-pos  buffer-cur)
break;

then becomes totally bogus.

I guess _cpp_overlay_buffer/_cpp_remove_overlay must temporarily invalidate the
notes somehow.


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-11-22 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
   ||gnu.org

--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-22 
22:46:02 UTC ---
It also fails with the 64-bit compiler on SPARC/Solaris, not just -m64.


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-09-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2
  Known to fail||


[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-07-14 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com


--- Comment #9 from rob1weld at aol dot com  2010-07-14 17:27 ---
Thanks for working on this guys, 
Rob


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213



[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-06-25 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE


--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-06-25 
16:48 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and
--traditional-cpp

It occured to me that this is only failing for me with 32-bit cc1,
i.e. i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, mips-sgi-irix6.5, but
not alpha-dec-osf5.1 (which is 64-bit).

Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213



[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-06-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-24 11:51 ---
note-type == 10 is:
  *d = '\n';
  /* A sentinel note that should never be processed.  */
  add_line_note (buffer, d + 1, '\n');
  buffer-next_line = s + 1;
created.  But, as this PR lacks a testcase (well, the testcase depends on a
proprietary header file not included here), it is hard to guess what's going
on.
Can you see if doing just
cp /usr/include/stdlib.h /tmp/stdlib.h
gcc -E -traditional-cpp /tmp/stdlib.h
If yes, can you distill a smaller testcase from it (ideally at most a few
lines)?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213



[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-06-24 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE


--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-06-24 
12:20 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and
--traditional-cpp

 --- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-24 11:51 ---

 created.  But, as this PR lacks a testcase (well, the testcase depends on a
 proprietary header file not included here), it is hard to guess what's going
 on.

I could include the OpenSolaris header, which is licensed under CDDL,
but I've just been able to construct a minimal testcase:

$ cat include.c
#include stdlib.h
$ cat stdlib.h
#pragma redefine_extnamemkstemp64   mkstemp
$ ./cc1 -E -traditional-cpp ./include.c -o include.i -I . -m64
In file included from ./include.c:2:0:
./stdlib.h:1:0: internal compiler error: Abort

This should make it easier to find what's going on.  Unlike the original
test case from the GCC testsuite, this one fails even without -m64.

Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213



[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-06-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-24 12:56 ---
Can't reproduce on x86_64-linux (and, #pragma redefine_extname seems to be
handled on all targets, not just Solaris).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213



[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-06-24 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE


--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-06-24 
13:50 ---
Subject: Re:  [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and
--traditional-cpp

 --- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-24 12:56 ---
 Can't reproduce on x86_64-linux (and, #pragma redefine_extname seems to be
 handled on all targets, not just Solaris).

This seems to be extremely sensitive to command line parameters.  E.g. on
mips-sgi-irix6.5 it works (no ICE) with

$ cc1 -E -tditional-cpp include.c -o include.i -I .

When I add either -mabi=n32 or -mabi=64, cc1 aborts.

Similarly, on sparc-sun-solaris2.11:

$ cc1 -E -traditional-cpp include.c -o include.i -I .

ICEs

$ cc1 -E -traditional-cpp `pwd`/include.c -o include.i -I .

works.

Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213



[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

2010-06-21 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-21 12:35 ---
Updated summary (you list the regressed branches to fix, not the working one).


-- 

ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to fail|4.4.0 4.5.0 |4.4.5 4.5.1 4.6.0
  Known to work|3.4.3   |3.4.6
Summary|Regression [3.4.3]  |[4.4/4.5/4.6 regression]
   |Preprocessor ICE with -m64  |Preprocessor ICE with -m64
   |and --traditional-cpp   |and --traditional-cpp
   Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213