[Bug rtl-optimization/14737] Purge political statement from -ffast-math docs
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-02 23:25 --- Fixed in GCC 4.3, if someone wants to backport it to old branches, go ahead, the patch should apply cleanly and the Changelog would be similar. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737
[Bug rtl-optimization/14737] Purge political statement from -ffast-math docs
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 16:23 --- Subject: Bug 14737 Author: manu Date: Sat Mar 31 16:22:51 2007 New Revision: 123382 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123382 Log: 2007-03-31 Wolfgang Bangerth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR 14737 * doc/invoke.texi: (optimization options): Reword description of -ffast-math. Document its primary purpose. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737
[Bug rtl-optimization/14737] Purge political statement from -ffast-math docs
--- Comment #5 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-03-26 03:13 --- Manuel, thanks for (re-)submitting the patch today. I don't have the infrastructure to test patches any more these days, but I appreciate that someone takes up the issue again. I think the text duplication is not the biggest issue. It could be tackled later on, but I think it is more important to fix the issue. Thanks W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737
[Bug rtl-optimization/14737] Purge political statement from -ffast-math docs
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-03-26 04:41 --- Subject: Bug number PR 14737 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01649.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737
[Bug rtl-optimization/14737] Purge political statement from -ffast-math docs
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 00:03 --- If this is confirmed as a bug, why don't you submit the patch to gcc-patches? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14737