[Bug rtl-optimization/21507] [4.0/4.1 Regression] BYTEmark floating-point emulation: Regression with -O3
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-17 14:43 --- Confirmed by Richard. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-05-17 14:43:48 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21507
[Bug rtl-optimization/21507] [4.0/4.1 Regression] BYTEmark floating-point emulation: Regression with -O3
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-17 14:44 --- Won't be fixed on the 4.0 and 4.1 branches. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21507
[Bug rtl-optimization/21507] [4.0/4.1 Regression] BYTEmark floating-point emulation: Regression with -O3
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21507
[Bug rtl-optimization/21507] [4.0/4.1 Regression] BYTEmark floating-point emulation: Regression with -O3
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-10 12:32 --- Numbers for -static -O3 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer (on a P4) 3.4.6: 8.1s 4.0.3: 7.3s 4.1.1: 13.5s 4.2.0: 4.2s (is there a correctness check inside the benchmark?) with FDO: 3.4.6: 5.8s 4.0.3: 9.8s 4.1.1: 10.5s 4.2.0: 4.2s indeed interesting that we loose on FDO for 4.0, and bad that we're that much slower for 4.1. Good for mainline though. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]|[4.0/4.1 Regression] |BYTEmark floating-point |BYTEmark floating-point |emulation: Regression with -|emulation: Regression with - |O3 |O3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21507