[Bug rtl-optimization/85770] [9 Regression] ICE: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1439 with -march=nano-1000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85770 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 6 23:39:12 2018 New Revision: 266880 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266880&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/85770 * gcc.target/i386/pr85770.c: Require int128 effective target. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr85770.c
[Bug rtl-optimization/85770] [9 Regression] ICE: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1439 with -march=nano-1000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85770 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Fixed on the trunk by Segher's combiner patch to avoid combining with hard regs. Test added to the regression suite.
[Bug rtl-optimization/85770] [9 Regression] ICE: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1439 with -march=nano-1000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85770 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Dec 6 00:40:08 2018 New Revision: 266839 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266839&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/85770 * gcc.target/i386/pr85770.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr85770.c Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug rtl-optimization/85770] [9 Regression] ICE: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1439 with -march=nano-1000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85770 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Not currently failing on the trunk. Bisecting to see if it was fixed or just went latent...
[Bug rtl-optimization/85770] [9 Regression] ICE: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1439 with -march=nano-1000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85770 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- AFAICS, there is nothing wrong with the target part.