[Bug rtl-optimization/97836] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r11-5029

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836

Jan Hubicka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka  ---
EAF_UNUSED is now realy unused.

[Bug rtl-optimization/97836] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r11-5029

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|11.2|11.3

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 11.2 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.3

[Bug rtl-optimization/97836] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r11-5029

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|11.0|11.2

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 11.1 has been released, retargeting bugs to GCC 11.2.

[Bug rtl-optimization/97836] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r11-5029

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836

--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka  ---
indeed, I think for gcc11 we want to make return mark value as used and for
next stage1 we want to design EAF flags bit more carefully...

[Bug rtl-optimization/97836] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by r11-5029

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836

Jan Hubicka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[11 Regression] wrong code  |wrong code at -O1 on
   |at -O1 on   |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by
   |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu by  |r11-5029
   |r11-5029|

--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka  ---
It is no longer regression,  I will look into defining EAF_UNUSED better next
stage1.