[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 --- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Mon May 30 09:26:09 2016 New Revision: 236873 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236873=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-30 Dominique d'HumieresBackport from trunk. 2015-10-23 Maxim Ostapenko PR sanitizer/68042 * c-c++-common/asan/sanity-check-pure-c-1.c: Adjust test to pass on Darwin. Modified: branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/sanity-check-pure-c-1.c
[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Should be fix on trunk.
[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 --- Comment #5 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Author: chefmax Date: Fri Oct 23 07:22:37 2015 New Revision: 229212 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229212=gcc=rev Log: Fix ASan output pattern tests on Darwin. gcc/testsuite/ PR sanitizer/68042 * c-c++-common/asan/memcmp-1.c: Adjust test to pass on Darwin. * c-c++-common/asan/sanity-check-pure-c-1.c: Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/memcmp-1.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/sanity-check-pure-c-1.c
[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Should be fix on trunk. Confirmed, Thanks for the quick fix. Closing.
[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0
[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 --- Comment #3 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 36562 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36562=edit Draft patch. Here an expected patch for memcmp-1.c and sanity-check-pure-c-1.c output patterns. Does it fix the problem?
[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 36562 [details] > Draft patch. > > Here an expected patch for memcmp-1.c and sanity-check-pure-c-1.c output > patterns. > > Does it fix the problem? >From a quick test, yes. Thanks for the quick patch.
[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 --- Comment #1 from Maxim Ostapenko --- I wonder if the fix would be just output patterns adjustment (just like here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939)?
[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2015-10-21 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I wonder if the fix would be just output patterns adjustment (just like here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939)? Indeed, however the regexprs are quite unfriendly and I probably won't have the time to look at them before the end of the week.