[Bug sanitizer/77963] inconsistent (false?) leaks detection.

[pawel_sikora at zoho dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77963

--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora  ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #1)
> lsan does not work with ptrace. 
> There is https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/728 for it. 
> We don't have plans to fix it, but the change I sent for review yesterday 
> causes lsan to complain loudly instead of producing false reports. 

this change clarify the situation with shiny message but doesn't help to much
in the real development scenario. under gdb/strace session the process will
terminate with exit code 1 and may breaks application flow due to unexpected
exit code of the child process. in such case i need to setup manually for debug
session the ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0 to workaround the lsan die(). it would
be better to omit the die() in such case (no ptrace-available).

[Bug sanitizer/77963] inconsistent (false?) leaks detection.

[kcc at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77963

--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany  ---
lsan does not work with ptrace. 
There is https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/728 for it. 
We don't have plans to fix it, but the change I sent for review yesterday 
causes lsan to complain loudly instead of producing false reports. 

If you know how to *fix* it, i.e. to make lsan work with ptrace -- please tell.