[Bug sanitizer/88277] ASAN stack poisoning is using unaligned stores on e.g. x86_64

[marxin at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88277

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org  |unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška  ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #2)
> FWIW modern x86 CPUs are fairly good at unaligned accesses, so it might not
> be worth it for performance.

That said, I'm leaving that..

[Bug sanitizer/88277] ASAN stack poisoning is using unaligned stores on e.g. x86_64

[andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88277

Andi Kleen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org

--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen  ---
FWIW modern x86 CPUs are fairly good at unaligned accesses, so it might not be
worth it for performance.

[Bug sanitizer/88277] ASAN stack poisoning is using unaligned stores on e.g. x86_64

[marxin at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88277

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |marxin at gcc dot 
gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška  ---
Let me take it for next stage1.