[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- testcases added so marking this as a dup of bug 99766. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 99766 ***
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fa4f982636e7e66eee6a9b45cc0939ae95b4659 commit r12-6164-g5fa4f982636e7e66eee6a9b45cc0939ae95b4659 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Sat Jan 1 08:44:48 2022 + Committed: Add testcases for a few PRs These were fixed as part of the fix for PR 99766, I thought it would be useful to add a few testcases for the other cases that were failing. Committed as obvious after running the tests to make sure they work. PR rtl-optimization/100241 PR rtl-optimization/99787 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr100241-1.c: New test. * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr99787-1.c: New test.
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=99787 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2022-01-01 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Let me add the testcase for this one and PR 99787
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6) > Fixed by r11-7864. Not sure if we want this test. It doesn't contain > __fp16 like the test in r11-7864. PR 99787 also has a testcase that could be done too. I think we should add a testcase for both bugs.
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed by r11-7864. Not sure if we want this test. It doesn't contain __fp16 like the test in r11-7864.
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- I can't reproduce this with latest trunk :-(. Bisecting...
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Single, hopefully valid TU, no LTO needed:
$ gcc -march=armv8-a -fPIC -O3 100241.c -fvisibility=internal -c
100241.c: In function ‘vp9_first_pass_encode_tile_mb_row’:
100241.c:32:1: error: unable to generate reloads for:
32 | }
| ^
(insn 74 89 90 14 (set (reg:V2DI 136)
(vec_concat:V2DI (mem:DI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 178 [orig:113 fp_acc_data
] [113])
(const_int 16 [0x10])) [3
fp_acc_data_15(D)->frame_noise_energy+0 S8 A64])
(mem:DI (plus:DI (reg/v/f:DI 178 [orig:113 fp_acc_data ] [113])
(const_int 24 [0x18])) [3 fp_acc_data_15(D)->intra_error+0
S8 A64]))) "100241.c":23:63 2473 {load_pair_lanesdi}
(nil))
during RTL pass: reload
100241.c:32:1: internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at
lra-constraints.c:4133
0x152862f diagnostic_impl(rich_location*, diagnostic_metadata const*, int, char
const*, std::__va_list*, diagnostic_t)
???:0
0xce52ff internal_error(char const*, ...)
???:0
0xce53f3 fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*)
???:0
0x7db1d7 _fatal_insn(char const*, rtx_def const*, char const*, int, char
const*)
???:0
0xea8d57 curr_insn_transform(bool)
???:0
0xea3d87 lra_constraints(bool)
???:0
0x131523b lra(_IO_FILE*)
???:0
0x1308fff (anonymous namespace)::pass_reload::execute(function*)
???:0
extern char num_4x4_blocks_high_lookup, num_4x4_blocks_wide_lookup,
vp9_foreach_transformed_block_in_plane_xd_0_0_0;
int vp9_first_pass_encode_tile_mb_row_cpi_0,
vp9_first_pass_encode_tile_mb_row_tile_data_0_0, vp9_encode_sby_pass1_x;
typedef void foreach_transformed_block_visitor();
void vp9_encode_sby_pass1();
typedef struct {
long coded_error;
long sr_coded_error;
long frame_noise_energy;
long intra_error;
} FIRSTPASS_DATA;
typedef struct {
FIRSTPASS_DATA fp_data;
} TileDataEnc;
TileDataEnc accumulate_fp_mb_row_stat_this_tile;
void vp9_first_pass_encode_tile_mb_row(FIRSTPASS_DATA *fp_acc_data) {
int mb_col_end = vp9_first_pass_encode_tile_mb_row_tile_data_0_0;
for (; mb_col_end;) {
vp9_encode_sby_pass1();
if (vp9_first_pass_encode_tile_mb_row_cpi_0) {
FIRSTPASS_DATA __trans_tmp_1 = *fp_acc_data;
accumulate_fp_mb_row_stat_this_tile.fp_data.coded_error +=
accumulate_fp_mb_row_stat_this_tile.fp_data.sr_coded_error +=
__trans_tmp_1.sr_coded_error;
accumulate_fp_mb_row_stat_this_tile.fp_data.frame_noise_energy +=
__trans_tmp_1.frame_noise_energy;
accumulate_fp_mb_row_stat_this_tile.fp_data.intra_error +=
__trans_tmp_1.intra_error;
}
}
}
foreach_transformed_block_visitor vp9_foreach_transformed_block_in_plane_visit;
void vp9_foreach_transformed_block_in_plane(void *arg) {
int c, max_blocks_wide = num_4x4_blocks_wide_lookup;
for (; num_4x4_blocks_high_lookup;) {
c = 0;
for (; c < max_blocks_wide;
c += vp9_foreach_transformed_block_in_plane_xd_0_0_0)
vp9_foreach_transformed_block_in_plane_visit(arg);
}
}
void vp9_encode_sby_pass1() {
vp9_foreach_transformed_block_in_plane(_encode_sby_pass1_x);
}
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Now reproduced with a single file. Reducing that...
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- This is on aarch64: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/11/lto-wrapper Target: aarch64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --enable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-linker-build-id --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --enable-plugin --enable-initfini-array --without-isl --enable-gnu-indirect-function --build=aarch64-redhat-linux Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.0.1 20210324 (Red Hat 11.0.1-0) (GCC)
[Bug target/100241] internal compiler error: in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4133
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100241 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- I'm reducing this again, the original code was valid I think.
