[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d7e8e713c5b20141de02f9c4fb11e77c2f66484 commit r8-10948-g0d7e8e713c5b20141de02f9c4fb11e77c2f66484 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sun May 2 14:17:23 2021 +0200 nvptx: Fix up nvptx build against latest libstdc++ [PR100375] The r12-220-gd96db15967e78d7cecea3b1cf3169ceb924678ac change deprecated some non-standard std::pair constructors and that apparently broke nvptx.c build, where pseudo_node_t is std::pair and so nullptr (or NULL) needs to be used for the first argument of the ctors instead of 0. 2021-05-02 Jakub Jelinek PR target/100375 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_sese_pseudo): Use NULL instead of 0 as first argument of pseudo_node_t constructors. (cherry picked from commit 7911a905276781c20f704f5a91b5125e0184d072)
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af08d7265bb5a82f3728737476c8098458a8d210 commit r9-9507-gaf08d7265bb5a82f3728737476c8098458a8d210 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sun May 2 14:17:23 2021 +0200 nvptx: Fix up nvptx build against latest libstdc++ [PR100375] The r12-220-gd96db15967e78d7cecea3b1cf3169ceb924678ac change deprecated some non-standard std::pair constructors and that apparently broke nvptx.c build, where pseudo_node_t is std::pair and so nullptr (or NULL) needs to be used for the first argument of the ctors instead of 0. 2021-05-02 Jakub Jelinek PR target/100375 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_sese_pseudo): Use NULL instead of 0 as first argument of pseudo_node_t constructors. (cherry picked from commit 7911a905276781c20f704f5a91b5125e0184d072)
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0f9800f389bae0f3f311844cdc8fc91156e8718 commit r10-9795-ga0f9800f389bae0f3f311844cdc8fc91156e8718 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sun May 2 14:17:23 2021 +0200 nvptx: Fix up nvptx build against latest libstdc++ [PR100375] The r12-220-gd96db15967e78d7cecea3b1cf3169ceb924678ac change deprecated some non-standard std::pair constructors and that apparently broke nvptx.c build, where pseudo_node_t is std::pair and so nullptr (or NULL) needs to be used for the first argument of the ctors instead of 0. 2021-05-02 Jakub Jelinek PR target/100375 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_sese_pseudo): Use NULL instead of 0 as first argument of pseudo_node_t constructors. (cherry picked from commit 7911a905276781c20f704f5a91b5125e0184d072)
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da9c085ddbfe61e5954c8ec4e996240fa3a994c0 commit r11-8346-gda9c085ddbfe61e5954c8ec4e996240fa3a994c0 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sun May 2 14:17:23 2021 +0200 nvptx: Fix up nvptx build against latest libstdc++ [PR100375] The r12-220-gd96db15967e78d7cecea3b1cf3169ceb924678ac change deprecated some non-standard std::pair constructors and that apparently broke nvptx.c build, where pseudo_node_t is std::pair and so nullptr (or NULL) needs to be used for the first argument of the ctors instead of 0. 2021-05-02 Jakub Jelinek PR target/100375 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_sese_pseudo): Use nullptr instead of 0 as first argument of pseudo_node_t constructors. (cherry picked from commit 7911a905276781c20f704f5a91b5125e0184d072)
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- I need to fix libstdc++ to accept the code with a deprecated warning, rather than reject it. I think it only rejects it with -pedantic but it should still be fixed to work until the deprecated constructor is removed.
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Version|11.0|12.0 Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Fixed.
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7911a905276781c20f704f5a91b5125e0184d072 commit r12-343-g7911a905276781c20f704f5a91b5125e0184d072 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Sun May 2 14:17:23 2021 +0200 nvptx: Fix up nvptx build against latest libstdc++ [PR100375] The r12-220-gd96db15967e78d7cecea3b1cf3169ceb924678ac change deprecated some non-standard std::pair constructors and that apparently broke nvptx.c build, where pseudo_node_t is std::pair and so nullptr (or NULL) needs to be used for the first argument of the ctors instead of 0. 2021-05-02 Jakub Jelinek PR target/100375 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_sese_pseudo): Use nullptr instead of 0 as first argument of pseudo_node_t constructors.
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- constructing pair using (0, 0) is non-standard. The point of r12-220 was to deprecate it, so it warns. Apparently I didn't manage to do that correctly. I'll look into that, but if you want to initialize a pointer when templates are involved (which is the case for std::pair's constructors) then don't use 0.
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- typedef struct basic_block_def *basic_block; typedef std::pair pseudo_node_t; So pseudo_node_t (nullptr, 0); or pseudo_node_t (NULL, 0); (given #ifdef __cplusplus #undef NULL #define NULL nullptr #endif )?
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- What type is pseudo_node_t? If the pair members are pointers, use nullptr not 0.
[Bug target/100375] [12 Regression] trunk 20210501 ftbfs for nvptx-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100375 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- r12-220-gd96db15967e78d7cecea3b1cf3169ceb924678ac ?
