[Bug target/102353] powerpc64le-linux-gnu build failure when build != host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102353 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus --- Should be FIXED :-) @Bill: Thanks for testing the native build!
[Bug target/102353] powerpc64le-linux-gnu build failure when build != host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102353 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acd7e7b33fd576b336ca0bf5ec51f77b32ba51cc commit r12-3581-gacd7e7b33fd576b336ca0bf5ec51f77b32ba51cc Author: Tobias Burnus Date: Thu Sep 16 18:35:34 2021 +0200 PowerPC: Fix rs6000-gen-builtins with build != host [PR102353] This mimics what the main Makefile.in does: compile the generator files under build (with Makefile.in's 'build/%.o' rule for compilation). It also adds $(RUN_GEN) to optionally run it with valgrind and the $(build_exeext) suffix. Before, the .o files were compiled with $(COMPILE), causing link error with $(LINKER_FOR_BUILD) for build != host. gcc/ PR target/102353 * config/rs6000/t-rs6000 (build/rs6000-gen-builtins.o, build/rbtree.o): Added 'build/' to target, use build/%.o rule. (build/rs6000-gen-builtins$(build_exeext)): Add 'build/' and '$(build_exeext)' to target and 'build/' for the *.o files. (rs6000-builtins.c): Update for those changes; run rs6000-gen-builtins with $(RUN_GEN).
[Bug target/102353] powerpc64le-linux-gnu build failure when build != host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102353 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Thanks, Tobias! I'm sorry for getting this exactly backwards... Your patch looks good. I am doing a quick host=target=build bootstrap and will respond on-list when it'sdone.
[Bug target/102353] powerpc64le-linux-gnu build failure when build != host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102353 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- As crossref: * r12-3098-g34ad198138f7a64355c92090e1db260ee135495d caused the regression "rs6000: Incorporate new builtins code into the build machinery" * Submitted patch by me at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579553.html
[Bug target/102353] powerpc64le-linux-gnu build failure when build != host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102353 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think rs6000-gen-builtins is supposed to be a build binary, not a host binary? I'm seeing this at the end of my build log with that patch. ./rs6000-gen-builtins /path/to/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin-new.def \ /path/to/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def rs6000-builtins.h \ rs6000-builtins.c rs6000-vecdefines.h /path/to/bin/bash: ./rs6000-gen-builtins: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error /path/to/gcc/config/rs6000/t-rs6000:67: recipe for target 'rs6000-builtins.c' failed
[Bug target/102353] powerpc64le-linux-gnu build failure when build != host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102353 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- Hi Sandra, Does the following work for your cross? diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/t-rs6000 b/gcc/config/rs6000/t-rs6000 index 92766d8ea25..738d4cf9493 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/t-rs6000 +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/t-rs6000 @@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ rbtree.o: $(srcdir)/config/rs6000/rbtree.c $(POSTCOMPILE) rs6000-gen-builtins: rs6000-gen-builtins.o rbtree.o - $(LINKER_FOR_BUILD) $(BUILD_LINKERFLAGS) $(BUILD_LDFLAGS) -o $@ \ - $(filter-out $(BUILD_LIBDEPS), $^) $(BUILD_LIBS) + $(LINKER) $(ALL_LINKERFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $< rbtree.o -o $@ # TODO: Whenever GNU make 4.3 is the minimum required, we should use # grouped targets on this: Thanks! Bill
[Bug target/102353] powerpc64le-linux-gnu build failure when build != host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102353 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2021-09-15 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- Ah, sorry for the silly mistake. Mine.
[Bug target/102353] powerpc64le-linux-gnu build failure when build != host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102353 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ooops, I meant x86_64-linux-gnu build, not host. :-(
