[Bug target/109501] vec_test_data_class defines missing

[chip.kerchner at ibm dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109501

--- Comment #8 from Chip Kerchner  ---
Well, then I'm asking GCC to add these to make it easier to use
`vec_test_data_class`

[Bug target/109501] vec_test_data_class defines missing

[segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109501

--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
"For clarity of code, the following named constants are suggested. Preferably,
compilers will provide these constants in a header file, but this is not
required
for compliance."

[Bug target/109501] vec_test_data_class defines missing

[segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109501

Segher Boessenkool  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
None of those are required.  All are optional.  No portable code should use
them.

[Bug target/109501] vec_test_data_class defines missing

[chip.kerchner at ibm dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109501

--- Comment #5 from Chip Kerchner  ---
Here's a testcase

```
#include 
#include 

int main()
{
  __vector float p4f = { float(0), float(1), float(2), float(3) };
  __vector __bool int nan_selector = vec_test_data_class(p4f,
__VEC_CLASS_FP_NAN);

  return 0;
}
```

```
NAN_defines.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
NAN_defines.cpp:7:63: error: ‘__VEC_CLASS_FP_NAN’ was not declared in this
scope
7 |   __vector __bool int nan_selector = vec_test_data_class(p4f,
__VEC_CLASS_FP_NAN);
  |  
^~
```

```
/opt/gcc-nightly/trunk/bin/g++ -O3 -mcpu=power9 NAN_defines.cpp

[Bug target/109501] vec_test_data_class defines missing

[chip.kerchner at ibm dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109501

--- Comment #4 from Chip Kerchner  ---
PowerPC LE - P9.

Yes, other PVIPR APIs are available and compile in more source code.

[Bug target/109501] vec_test_data_class defines missing

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109501

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|c++ |target

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Which target is this for?
If s390 did you include vecintrin.h?