[Bug target/113226] [14 Regression] testsuite/std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc fails for cris-elf after r14-6888-ga138b99646a555

[law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113226

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
   Priority|P3  |P4

[Bug target/113226] [14 Regression] testsuite/std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc fails for cris-elf after r14-6888-ga138b99646a555

[hp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113226

Hans-Peter Nilsson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|testsuite   |target

--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #3)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> > Huh, how bizarre.
> 
> Indeed.  I'm *not* ruling out an actual gcc bug.  Whether in the target or
> middle-end this time I dare not guess; too few posts.

I don't see this FAIL for m68k-unknown-linux-gnu in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-January/804595.html so let's
change to target component.

I'll see if I can revive one of the other *-elf toolchains to the point where
the libstdc++-v3 tests are useful before digging in.  (But also subject to
other priorities and unfortunately not among the highest.)