[Bug target/23322] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] performance regression

2009-02-12 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com 


--- Comment #34 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2009-02-12 13:43 ---
(In reply to comment #33)

 I can give it another run on 32bit tester. 

Yes, please.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23322

[Bug target/23322] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] performance regression

2009-02-08 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #33 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-08 11:32 
---
Partial memory issues are fixed, but I think related to register pressure
awareness of invariant motion we did not change much. Steven, what do you
think?
I can give it another run on 32bit tester. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23322

[Bug target/23322] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] performance regression

2009-02-03 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org 


--- Comment #32 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-02-03 16:16 ---
The patch for partial memory writes was committed.

How are we doing on this benchmark now?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23322

[Bug target/23322] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] performance regression

2009-02-03 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org 


-- 

bonzini at gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23322

[Bug target/23322] [4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] performance regression

2008-07-04 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #31 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-04 20:01 ---
Closing 4.1 branch.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 regression]
   |performance regression  |performance regression
   Target Milestone|4.1.3   |4.2.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23322