[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 10:38 --- Changing the summary to reflect reality and remove some of the obscure-ness. Mark, what was the obscureness you are refering to? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Summary|[4.1 Regression]|[4.1 Regression] |profilebootstrap failure|profilebootstrap failure |with debugging disabled | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 16:22 --- (In reply to comment #13) Changing the summary to reflect reality and remove some of the obscure-ness. Mark, what was the obscureness you are refering to? well both using BOOT_CFLAGS and profiledbootstrap together is less likely than just bootstrap and using BOOT_CFLAGS. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure
--- Comment #15 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-11-19 17:34 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 10:38 --- Changing the summary to reflect reality and remove some of the obscure-ness. Mark, what was the obscureness you are refering to? Sorry, that was indeed unclear. I don't consider building the compiler with profiledbootstrap to be a fundamental usage model. Most people don't do it, and there's an easy work-around: build with normal bootstrap. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org BugsThisDependsOn||22313 Summary|profilebootstrap failure|[4.1 Regression] |with debugging disabled |profilebootstrap failure ||with debugging disabled Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:18 --- Created an attachment (id=10279) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10279action=view) profile data 1/2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:19 --- Created an attachment (id=10280) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10280action=view) profile data 2/2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:28 --- Grrr, the testcase was created with some older binutils. Trying to create one with one that matches the reported error. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:59 --- Created an attachment (id=10282) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10282action=view) testcase new testcase. Compile with stage1/cc1 -fpreprocessed c-lex.i -quiet -dumpbase c-lex.i -auxbase-strip c-lex.o -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -Werror -version -fprofile-use -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fno-common -o /tmp/cciU35Gj.s GNU C version 4.1.0 20051116 (experimental) (SUSE Linux) (ia64-unknown-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 4.1.0 20051116 (experimental) (SUSE Linux). GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 Compiler executable checksum: 1c9d4c0e30064cb5ef51bb1a6548d214 stage1/as -x -o c-lex.o /tmp/cciU35Gj.s /tmp/cciU35Gj.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cciU35Gj.s:308: Warning: Corrupted unwind info due to unsupported section switching /tmp/cciU35Gj.s:4760: Internal error! Assertion failure in ia64_estimate_size_before_relax at ../../gas/config/tc-ia64.c line 3098. Please report this bug. not using -freorder-blocks-and-partition fixes the problem. Adding -g does not make a difference. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10278|0 |1 is obsolete|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 20:59 --- Created an attachment (id=10283) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10283action=view) profile data 1/2 -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10279|0 |1 is obsolete|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 21:00 --- Created an attachment (id=10284) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10284action=view) profile data 2/2 -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10280|0 |1 is obsolete|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 21:00 --- Created an attachment (id=10285) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10285action=view) wrong assembly -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 21:01 --- Arguably an as bug, but maybe we should not use -freorder-blocks-and-partition on ia64 profiledbootstrap. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 21:02 --- So if -g does not fix it, then this is not related at all to PR 22313. We should just disable --freorder-blocks-and-partition if gas is unwilling to support unwind info when the section changes. See http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=994 for when the warning was introduced and more information on this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 21:07 --- See http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=994 for the binutils bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
[Bug target/24934] [4.1 Regression] profilebootstrap failure with debugging disabled
--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 02:22 --- This is too obscure to be release-critical. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24934
