[Bug target/25519] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics should only be mentioned instead of the builtins

2006-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-16 08:36 ---
Subject: Bug 25519

Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 08:36:03 2006
New Revision: 117774

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117774
Log:
2006-10-16  Richard Guenther  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR target/25519
* doc/extend.texi (X86 Built-in Functions): Fix typos in
SSE builtin documentation.  Document SSE2 builtins.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519



[Bug target/25519] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics should only be mentioned instead of the builtins

2006-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-16 08:39 ---
Subject: Bug 25519

Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 08:38:52 2006
New Revision: 117775

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117775
Log:
2006-10-16  Richard Guenther  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR target/25519
* doc/extend.texi (X86 Built-in Functions): Fix typos in
SSE builtin documentation.  Document SSE2 builtins.

Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/doc/extend.texi


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519



[Bug target/25519] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics should only be mentioned instead of the builtins

2006-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-16 08:40 ---
Subject: Bug 25519

Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 08:40:32 2006
New Revision: 117776

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117776
Log:
2006-10-16  Richard Guenther  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PR target/25519
* doc/extend.texi (X86 Built-in Functions): Fix typos in
SSE builtin documentation.  Document SSE2 builtins.

Modified:
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/doc/extend.texi


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519



[Bug target/25519] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics should only be mentioned instead of the builtins

2006-10-10 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org


--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org  2006-10-10 13:55 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25519

A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00542.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519



[Bug target/25519] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics should only be mentioned instead of the builtins

2006-06-04 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519



[Bug target/25519] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics should only be mentioned instead of the builtins

2006-04-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-28 17:39 ---
This is a documentation regression as now, the builtins are inconstaint with
the source.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org
   Severity|trivial |normal
Summary|Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics  |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
   |should only be mentioned|Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics
   |instead of the builtins |should only be mentioned
   ||instead of the builtins
   Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519



[Bug target/25519] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Intel (SSE/MMX) intrinsics should only be mentioned instead of the builtins

2006-04-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-28 17:41 ---
*** Bug 23218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||Pferdebert at west dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519