[Bug target/28193] [4.0 only] config/arm/arm.c:3140 ICE
--- Comment #8 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 17:47 --- Fixed in GCC-4.1.1 -- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|4.0.4 |4.1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28193
[Bug target/28193] [4.0 only] config/arm/arm.c:3140 ICE
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-28 23:31 --- Is this a regression? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|config/arm/arm.c:3140 ICE |[4.0 only] ||config/arm/arm.c:3140 ICE Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28193
[Bug target/28193] [4.0 only] config/arm/arm.c:3140 ICE
--- Comment #6 from sjackman at gmail dot com 2006-06-29 00:01 --- Applying the patch from r103277 fixes this bug. I also had r95736 and r103151 applied against my 4.0.3 tree at the time. So, I don't know if r103277 alone is sufficient. r103277 was meant to close PR target/23473, so this bug may be a duplicate of #23473. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28193
[Bug target/28193] [4.0 only] config/arm/arm.c:3140 ICE
--- Comment #7 from sjackman at gmail dot com 2006-06-29 00:10 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 only] config/arm/arm.c:3140 ICE On 28 Jun 2006 23:31:22 -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-28 23:31 --- Is this a regression? ... http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28193 I haven't tested any version of GCC earlier than 4.0.3 for this bug, so I don't know if it's a regression. I was testing svn versions after 4.0.3 and before 4.1.0 to discover when this bug was fixed. It appears it was fixed in r103277. Cheers, Shaun -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28193
