[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613 Chen Chen changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #11 from Chen Chen --- Sure. After years I have to click "forgot my pwd" to regain this account. Thanks for all the hard works done by everyone.
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613 --- Comment #10 from nightstrike --- Patch thread started here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/644674.html https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/4700e066-1b50-4e7b-92f7-d8c33a330...@gmail.com/ and ended with this solution: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/644701.html https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/Zbu34FTR73081bMb@tucnak/ which was committed in r14-8898-g2bb4556220285e. I believe based on comment 7, this can now be closed.
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to nightstrike from comment #8) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > > So just this one left I think: > > > > /gcc/src/gcc/ira-conflicts.c: Line 125: > > > > Still there, size_t is long long (64bits) while long is 32bits. > > Assuming this is now line 153: > > ``` > diff --git a/gcc/ira-conflicts.cc b/gcc/ira-conflicts.cc > index a4d93c8d734..4f2c2bdfebc 100644 > --- a/gcc/ira-conflicts.cc > +++ b/gcc/ira-conflicts.cc > @@ -150,9 +150,9 @@ build_conflict_bit_table (void) >if (internal_flag_ira_verbose > 0 && ira_dump_file != NULL) > fprintf >(ira_dump_file, > - "+++Allocating %ld bytes for conflict table (uncompressed size > %ld)\n", > - (long) allocated_words_num * sizeof (IRA_INT_TYPE), > - (long) object_set_words * ira_objects_num * sizeof (IRA_INT_TYPE)); > + "+++Allocating %zu bytes for conflict table (uncompressed size > %zu)\n", > + (size_t)(allocated_words_num * sizeof (IRA_INT_TYPE)), > + (size_t)(object_set_words * ira_objects_num * sizeof > (IRA_INT_TYPE))); > >objects_live = sparseset_alloc (ira_objects_num); >for (i = 0; i < ira_max_point; i++) > ``` > > Perhaps that will address the remaining issue? Post patches to gcc-patches instead of bugzilla. The patches in bugzilla are not considered candidates to be applied for trunk.
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 from nightstrike --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > So just this one left I think: > > /gcc/src/gcc/ira-conflicts.c: Line 125: > > Still there, size_t is long long (64bits) while long is 32bits. Assuming this is now line 153: ``` diff --git a/gcc/ira-conflicts.cc b/gcc/ira-conflicts.cc index a4d93c8d734..4f2c2bdfebc 100644 --- a/gcc/ira-conflicts.cc +++ b/gcc/ira-conflicts.cc @@ -150,9 +150,9 @@ build_conflict_bit_table (void) if (internal_flag_ira_verbose > 0 && ira_dump_file != NULL) fprintf (ira_dump_file, - "+++Allocating %ld bytes for conflict table (uncompressed size %ld)\n", - (long) allocated_words_num * sizeof (IRA_INT_TYPE), - (long) object_set_words * ira_objects_num * sizeof (IRA_INT_TYPE)); + "+++Allocating %zu bytes for conflict table (uncompressed size %zu)\n", + (size_t)(allocated_words_num * sizeof (IRA_INT_TYPE)), + (size_t)(object_set_words * ira_objects_num * sizeof (IRA_INT_TYPE))); objects_live = sparseset_alloc (ira_objects_num); for (i = 0; i < ira_max_point; i++) ``` Perhaps that will address the remaining issue?
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- /gcc/emit-rtl.c: Line 361: Fixed by r0-106223 /gcc/ggc-common.c: Line 310: r0-120670 (PR 53912) /gcc/graphite-dependences.c: Line 107: Removed. /gcc/src/gcc/pointer-set.c: Line 67: File full removed in 2014. /gcc/src/gcc/tree-dump.c: Line 168: Fixed by r0-120669 (53912) /gcc/src/gcc/cp/class.c: Line 6740, 6742, 6764, 6767, 6900: Fixed by r0-120604 (PR 53912) So just this one left I think: /gcc/src/gcc/ira-conflicts.c: Line 125: Still there, size_t is long long (64bits) while long is 32bits.
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
--- Comment #6 from aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2010-04-13 10:58 --- (In reply to comment #5) I don't get why you closed this bug. Anyways if you have a patch, post it to gcc-patc...@. Sorry, I see nobody concerns this, and I'm more anxious about how to port the libgcj (especially boehm-gc) to win64, so I closed it. Maybe i should use the diff to release a patch for it~ (Since I'm a newbee I've never done so :P) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
--- Comment #4 from aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2010-04-12 10:44 --- Maybe I should still choose the proprietary compiler of M$ for my Win_x64-target platform... -- aflyhorse at foxmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-12 14:12 --- I don't get why you closed this bug. Anyways if you have a patch, post it to gcc-patc...@. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WONTFIX | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
--- Comment #2 from aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2010-04-01 08:23 --- Got your ideas and be sorry for i chobber the building tree of my computer and the tree of package, there shouldn't be /gcc/src in the path (I was confused when i'm looking for the file myself) that time i'm testing the --enable-hash-synchronization option And could you please tell me why I always fail to build libgcj (after make install type gcj -v it tells me that libgcj.spec is missing and i find no libgcj.a .la in my lib directory) even if i added --enable-libgcj --enable-libjava in configure? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
--- Comment #3 from aflyhorse at foxmail dot com 2010-04-01 08:26 --- Also, the compiler do stopped and treat warnings as errors while compiling ira-conflicts.c until i changed these 2 %ld to %I64u -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613
[Bug target/43613] Some architecture-dependent codes
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 01:15 --- gcc/src/gcc/ira-conflicts.c: Line 125: That is printing out a long correctly (has no pointers in it, though it does have a sizeof). gcc/src/gcc/tree-dump.c: Line 168: /gcc/src/gcc/cp/class.c: Line 6740, 6742, 6764, 6767, 6900: Yes those need to be fixed, %p should be used but I cannot remember if that was in KR C, we only require KR C library while a C90 compiler :). The others are used for hashes and should be changed but don't make a difference. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43613
