[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-12 20:29:20 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-20 16:40:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Author: ramana > Date: Tue Mar 15 19:59:25 2011 > New Revision: 171017 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171017 > Log: > > Fix PR target/46788 > > > Added: > branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46788.c > - copied unchanged from r171005, > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46788.c > Modified: > branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog > branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.md > branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog The ChangeLog entry refers to PR 46778, it should refer to PR 46788.
[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 20:06:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > AFAICS, however, pr47688.c is still there. I think I managed to delete it now even though I did do a svn rename. Ramana
[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 19:59:29 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 19:59:25 2011 New Revision: 171017 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171017 Log: Fix PR target/46788 Added: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46788.c - copied unchanged from r171005, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46788.c Modified: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.md branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-15 17:16:11 UTC --- AFAICS, however, pr47688.c is still there.
[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 17:07:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Author: ramana > Date: Tue Mar 15 17:05:51 2011 > New Revision: 171002 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171002 > Log: > > Fixup last commit. > > Fixed PR target/46788 and not PR 47688 > > > Added: > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46788.c > - copied unchanged from r171001, > trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr47688.c > Modified: > trunk/gcc/ChangeLog > trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog This was fixed on trunk with this original commit followed by the commit in the previous comment. Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 16:14:21 2011 New Revision: 171000 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171000 Log: Fix PR 47688 2011-03-18 Ramana Radhakrishnan PR target/47668 gcc/ * config/arm/arm.md (arm_movtas_ze): Use 'L' instead of 'c' in the output template. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/arm/pr47688.c: New. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr47688.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.md trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 --- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-15 17:05:56 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Mar 15 17:05:51 2011 New Revision: 171002 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171002 Log: Fixup last commit. Fixed PR target/46788 and not PR 47688 Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr46788.c - copied unchanged from r171001, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr47688.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2011.03.10 11:59:32 Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-03-10 11:59:32 UTC --- Confirmed
[Bug target/46788] unsigned int possible treated as signed in a union/struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-02-04 10:35:43 UTC --- It's caused by 150953: Author: ramana Date: Thu Aug 20 08:09:29 2009 New Revision: 150953 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=3Dgcc&view=3Drev&rev=3D150953 Log: Fix twolf ICE for ARM 2009-08-19 Ramana Radhakrishnan Richard Earnshaw * config/arm/arm.c (arm_emit_movpair): Handle CONST_INT. * config/arm/arm.md (*arm_movtas_ze): New pattern for movt. You're missing an "#:upper16:" annotation in the *arm_movtas_ze pattern, c.f. the *arm_movt pattern. (Not posting a patch since my renewed attempt to get a copyright assignment seems to have ended up in /dev/null over at the FSF.)
