[Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken

2011-06-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374

Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1
   Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4

[Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken

2011-06-12 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374

--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-06-12 11:45:39 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)

 Revision 174635 is OK.  It may be caused by revision 174951:
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-06/msg00440.html

Huh?

Unless these testcases depend on totally broken vec_dupv4sf pattern, I
sincerely doubt that my patch could trigger these errors.  And we don't
vectorize at -O2.

[Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken

2011-06-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374

H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-12 14:30:31 
UTC ---
Dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 49375 ***

[Bug target/49374] [4.5 Regression] x86 backend is broken

2011-06-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49374

--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-06-11 16:27:59 
UTC ---
It could be my setup problem.