[Bug target/49392] [arm] spurious EABI version mismatches when LTO enabled

2011-06-15 Thread philb at gnu dot org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49392

philb at gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID

--- Comment #3 from philb at gnu dot org 2011-06-15 14:57:32 UTC ---
I just tried a different linker and that does seem to have made the problem go
away.  So I guess there is no gcc bug here.  Thanks.

[Bug target/49392] [arm] spurious EABI version mismatches when LTO enabled

2011-06-14 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49392

--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 
11:31:55 UTC ---
It looks like a linker error but ... 

Hmmm with a later version of gcc 4.6 branch that I have lying around the same
example doesn't spew out such error messages. I don't have a 4.6.0 build handy
to try this. 

I seem to be running binutils  2.21.51.20110525 FTR.

cheers
Ramana

[Bug target/49392] [arm] spurious EABI version mismatches when LTO enabled

2011-06-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49392

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-14 
12:40:03 UTC ---
There wasn't any change on the branch that would change this.