[Bug target/50355] Comparison is always true in alpha config code

2020-11-06 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50355

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> $ fgrep INTVAL /home/dcb/gcc/trunk.git/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c | fgrep 8
>   && INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) == -8)
>   mod_f = memmodel_from_int (INTVAL (operands[8]));
>  (INTVAL (x) & 0x) - 2 * (INTVAL (x) & 0x8000));
>  (INTVAL (x) == 8 ? "b"
>   fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, INTVAL (x) / 8);
> 
> So some nine years later, the code doesn't seem to exist anymore.

ok, closing as FIXED then

[Bug target/50355] Comparison is always true in alpha config code

2020-11-06 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50355

--- Comment #3 from David Binderman  ---
$ fgrep INTVAL /home/dcb/gcc/trunk.git/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c | fgrep 8
  && INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) == -8)
  mod_f = memmodel_from_int (INTVAL (operands[8]));
   (INTVAL (x) & 0x) - 2 * (INTVAL (x) & 0x8000));
   (INTVAL (x) == 8 ? "b"
  fprintf (file, HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC, INTVAL (x) / 8);

So some nine years later, the code doesn't seem to exist anymore.

[Bug target/50355] Comparison is always true in alpha config code

2020-11-06 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50355

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2020-11-06

--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> I can't seem to find the code in question in the source file any longer...

WAITING for David to reconfirm

[Bug target/50355] Comparison is always true in alpha config code

2019-09-27 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50355

--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager  ---
I can't seem to find the code in question in the source file any longer...