[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-15 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Known to work||4.9.0

--- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed.  Thanks fro the report and the fix guys.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-15 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #23 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed.  Thanks fro the report and the fix guys.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-14 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: iains
Date: Sat Sep 14 11:09:55 2013
New Revision: 202590

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202590root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc:

PR target/58269
config/i386/i386.c (ix86_function_arg_regno_p): Make Darwin use the
xmm register set described in the psABI.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #8 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Fri Sep  6 10:36:30 2013
New Revision: 202318

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202318root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/58269
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_conditional_register_usage):
Proper initialize extended SSE registers.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
patch for the remainder of the fix posted at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00384.html


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
My x86_64-linux builds too are broken in libobj/sendmsg.c. Thus the issue isn't
limited to *-darwin.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #10)
 My x86_64-linux builds too are broken in libobj/sendmsg.c. Thus the issue
 isn't limited to *-darwin.

hmm there appears to be a second issue - also showing on Darwin (perhaps
related to 202286) - my test was against 202275.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Yes, confirmed that on x86_64-linux r202286 is the culprit.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
 Yes, confirmed that on x86_64-linux r202286 is the culprit.

See pr58139 comments #6 to #11.

I have successfully bootstrapped r202312 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with the
following patch:

--- /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/config/i386/i386.c2013-08-28 18:59:22.0
+0200
+++ /opt/gcc/work/gcc/config/i386/i386.c2013-09-06 10:46:46.0 +0200
@@ -4218,7 +4218,7 @@ ix86_conditional_register_usage (void)

   /* If AVX512F is disabled, squash the registers.  */
   if (! TARGET_AVX512F)
-for (i = FIRST_EXT_REX_SSE_REG; i  LAST_EXT_REX_SSE_REG; i++)
+for (i = FIRST_EXT_REX_SSE_REG; i = LAST_EXT_REX_SSE_REG; i++)
   fixed_regs[i] = call_used_regs[i] = 1, reg_names[i] = ;
 }

@@ -5708,7 +5708,8 @@ ix86_function_arg_regno_p (int regno)

   if (TARGET_MACHO)
 {
-  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE)
+  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE
+   ! EXT_REX_SSE_REGNO_P (regno))
 return true;
 }
   else
@@ -34466,7 +34467,7 @@ ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok (int regno, enum

   /* OImode move is available only when AVX is enabled.  */
   return ((TARGET_AVX  mode == OImode)
-  || VALID_AVX256_REG_MODE (mode)
+  || (TARGET_AVX  VALID_AVX256_REG_MODE (mode))
   || VALID_SSE_REG_MODE (mode)
   || VALID_SSE2_REG_MODE (mode)
   || VALID_MMX_REG_MODE (mode)

Note that the first hunk is r202318 and that without the second hunk, bootstrap
fails with

Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
libiberty/md5.o differs
libiberty/regex.o differs


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13)
  Yes, confirmed that on x86_64-linux r202286 is the culprit.
 
 See pr58139 comments #6 to #11.

 @@ -34466,7 +34467,7 @@ ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok (int regno, enum
  
/* OImode move is available only when AVX is enabled.  */
return ((TARGET_AVX  mode == OImode)
 -   || VALID_AVX256_REG_MODE (mode)
 +   || (TARGET_AVX  VALID_AVX256_REG_MODE (mode))
 || VALID_SSE_REG_MODE (mode)
 || VALID_SSE2_REG_MODE (mode)
 || VALID_MMX_REG_MODE (mode)
 

assuming that the patch above is applied to deal with pr58139,

Are you saying that:
-  if (TARGET_MACHO)
-{
-  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE)
-return true;
-}
-  else
-{
-  if (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
-   (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX))
-return true;
-}
+  if (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
+   (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX))
+return true;

gives a compare fail for you?

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #14)
 assuming that the patch above is applied to deal with pr58139,

Indeed!

 Are you saying that:
 -  if (TARGET_MACHO)
 -{
 -  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE)
 -return true;
 -}
 -  else
 -{
 -  if (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
 -   (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX))
 -return true;
 -}
 +  if (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
 +   (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX))
 +return true;
 gives a compare fail for you?

No: I did not test it although the initial fix worked for me). The comparison
failures occur with r202318 and the patch for pr58139 only. These failures are
fixed by the patch

--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -5708,7 +5708,8 @@ ix86_function_arg_regno_p (int regno)

   if (TARGET_MACHO)
 {
-  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE)
+  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE
+  ! EXT_REX_SSE_REGNO_P (regno))
 return true;
 }
   else

from comment #6.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu

--- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
Trunk still ICEs on x86_64-apple-darwin12...

/sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/gcc-4.9-20130906/libobjc/sendmsg.c:848:1:
internal compiler error: in check_rtl, at lra.c:2034
 }
 ^
using...

r202335 | hubicka | 2013-09-06 10:39:17 -0400 (Fri, 06 Sep 2013) | 3 lines

* i386.c (ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok): AVX modes are valid only when   
AVX is enabled.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #16)
 Trunk still ICEs on x86_64-apple-darwin12...
 
 /sw/src/fink.build/gcc49-4.9.0-1000/gcc-4.9-20130906/libobjc/sendmsg.c:848:1:
 internal compiler error: in check_rtl, at lra.c:2034
  }
  ^
 using...
 
 r202335 | hubicka | 2013-09-06 10:39:17 -0400 (Fri, 06 Sep 2013) | 3 lines
 
 * i386.c (ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok): AVX modes are valid only when   
 
 AVX is enabled.

I have 202322 built with

   /* OImode move is available only when AVX is enabled.  */
   return ((TARGET_AVX  mode == OImode)
-  || VALID_AVX256_REG_MODE (mode)
+  || (TARGET_AVX  VALID_AVX256_REG_MODE (mode))
   || VALID_SSE_REG_MODE (mode)
   || VALID_SSE2_REG_MODE (mode)
   || VALID_MMX_REG_MODE (mode)

and

-  if (TARGET_MACHO)
-{
-  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE)
-return true;
-}
-  else
-{
-  if (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
-   (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX))
-return true;
-}
+  if (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
+   (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX))
+return true;


it bootstrapped successfully and is in testing at present.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #18 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net ---
On Sep 6, 2013, at 8:43 AM, howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
* i386.c (ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok): AVX modes are valid only when  
  
AVX is enabled.

llvm has:

  // The first 8 512-bit vector arguments are passed in ZMM registers.
  CCIfNotVarArgCCIfType[v16i32, v8i64, v16f32, v8f64],
CCIfSubtargethasAVX512(),
CCAssignToReg[ZMM0, ZMM1, ZMM2, ZMM3, ZMM4, ZMM5, ZMM6, ZMM7],

just after the sse registers…  conceptually, I wonder if gcc is missing that.

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #21 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net ---
Don't know…  I'd assume there exists a paper somewhere that says it.  :-)

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)

The full commit where this was added to llvm is at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.cvs/153081 and references
http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-isa-extensions (and I assume
http://download-software.intel.com/sites/default/files/319433-015.pdf).


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-06 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mike Stump from comment #18)
 On Sep 6, 2013, at 8:43 AM, howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
 gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 * i386.c (ix86_hard_regno_mode_ok): AVX modes are valid only when
 
 AVX is enabled.
 
 llvm has:
 
   // The first 8 512-bit vector arguments are passed in ZMM registers.
   CCIfNotVarArgCCIfType[v16i32, v8i64, v16f32, v8f64],
 CCIfSubtargethasAVX512(),
 CCAssignToReg[ZMM0, ZMM1, ZMM2, ZMM3, ZMM4, ZMM5, ZMM6,
 ZMM7],
 
 just after the sse registers…  conceptually, I wonder if gcc is missing that.

On the basis that clang (Darwin11, Darwin12) defines the ABI - we should see
about this.  Presumably, this should be disabled for OS versions where
gcc-4.2/gcc-4.0 are the system compiler.

As of now, the documentation does not refer to this - the web page still points
to the older psABI.

Is there an official update to the System V psABI covering these regs?

[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to tocarip.intel from comment #6)
 -|| (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno) 

 Those changes are not needed. If TARGET_64BIT is fasle all sse registers
 except xmm0-xmm7 should be fixed. Correct fix is 

snip

 Looks like this will break ABI. Before we returned true for e. g. xmm10.

indeed, that was worrying me too.

 I couldn't find Darwin ABI to check which behaivor is correct.

The ABI for [x86_64] Darwin *should be* the same as 
System V Application Binary Interface AMD64 Architecture Processor Supplement
Draft Version 0.99.5

it is possible that:
(a) GCC has been broken a while and this is just not covered by the test-suite.
(b) the system ABI has deviated from the referenced document.

However - regardless of the doc, the system ABI is effectively defined by
Apple's GCC-4.2.1 (or successor clang, where that is not the system default).

 If we want to keep current behaivor something like 

snip 

 Should work.

I will apply your revised patch (and keep the second amendment in reserve) and
do some compat tests to find out what we need to do to be compliant with the
system

thanks for the patch, iain.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-05 Thread tocarip.intel at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

tocarip.intel at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tocarip.intel at gmail dot com

--- Comment #6 from tocarip.intel at gmail dot com ---
-|| (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  !fixed_regs[regno]));
+|| (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
+ (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX)
+ !fixed_regs[regno]));

Those changes are not needed. If TARGET_64BIT is fasle all sse registers except
xmm0-xmm7 should be fixed. Correct fix is 

index 0f4edb3..44b4b16 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -4231,10 +4231,10 @@ ix86_conditional_register_usage (void)
   /* If AVX512F is disabled, squash the registers.  */
   if (! TARGET_AVX512F)
   {
-for (i = FIRST_EXT_REX_SSE_REG; i  LAST_EXT_REX_SSE_REG; i++)
+for (i = FIRST_EXT_REX_SSE_REG; i = LAST_EXT_REX_SSE_REG; i++)
   fixed_regs[i] = call_used_regs[i] = 1, reg_names[i] = ;

-for (i = FIRST_MASK_REG; i  LAST_MASK_REG; i++)
+for (i = FIRST_MASK_REG; i = LAST_MASK_REG; i++)
   fixed_regs[i] = call_used_regs[i] = 1, reg_names[i] = ;
   }   
  }



-  if (TARGET_MACHO)
-{
-  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE)
-return true;
-}
-  else
-{
-  if (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
-   (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX))
-return true;
-}
+  if (TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno)
+   (regno  FIRST_SSE_REG + SSE_REGPARM_MAX))
+return true;

Looks like this will break ABI. Before we returned true for e. g. xmm10.
I couldn't find Darwin ABI to check which behaivor is correct.
If we want to keep current behaivor something like 

index 0f4edb3..a603167 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -5708,7 +5708,8 @@ ix86_function_arg_regno_p (int regno)

   if (TARGET_MACHO)
 {
-  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE)
+  if (SSE_REGNO_P (regno)  TARGET_SSE
+  ! EXT_REX_SSE_REGNO_P (regno))
 return true;
 }
   else

Should work.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30736
  -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30736action=edit
initial fix

AFAICT, the problem here is that 
TARGET_SSE  SSE_REGNO_P (regno) now produces a different answer from
pre-201915.

So, the patch attached is a necessary (but not proven to be sufficient) fix.

We need to audit all uses of SSE_REGNO_P () for darwin (at least).

AFAIU, the x86_64 Darwin ABI is the same as the linux/system V - so we should
be able to remove special-casing in some places (providing the SSE_REGPARM_MAX
values are the Right Fix and correctly specified).

I checked the Darwin x86_32 ABI info (briefly) and ISTM that the values for max
call arg usage of MMX and SSE regs in i386.h are right, so perhaps we can
remove more special-casing there too (not touched so far).

Will try some additional tests later - and I'd welcome Mike's PoV here on how
we prove sufficient.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-09-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
With the patch in comment #4 (and the one in pr58239, comment #14) on top of
revision 202144, I have successfully bootstrapped with all languages but go on
x86_64-apple-darwin10.

Note that the reported ICE occurs only for the 64 bit mode and it break all the
test in the suite that call __builtin_apply_args,
gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-27.c with the reported ICE and the others with

/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/builtin-apply-mmx.c: In function
'bar':
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/builtin-apply-mmx.c:35:1: internal
compiler error: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1281

Thanks for the patch.


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-08-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
note this *breaks bootstrap* for the normal language set.

reduced testcase:

int foo (int a, ...)
{
  void *args;
  args = __builtin_apply_args ();
  return 0;
}

/src/test/pr58269.c:7:1: internal compiler error: in check_rtl, at lra.c:2034


[Bug target/58269] [4.9 Regression] ICE when building libobjc on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision 201915

2013-08-31 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58269

--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
bt
#0  0x000100d7805a in internal_error (gmsgid=0x404 Address 0x404 out of
bounds) at /src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1120
#1  0x000100d78266 in fancy_abort (file=Could not find the frame base for
_Z11fancy_abortPKciS0_.
) at /src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/diagnostic.c:1180
#2  0x0001007e3f70 in check_rtl (final_p=true) at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/lra.c:2034
#3  0x0001007e49dd in lra (f=0x0) at /src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/lra.c:2426
#4  0x00010078da96 in do_reload () at /src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/ira.c:4689
#5  0x00010078dd4f in rest_of_handle_reload () at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/ira.c:4818
#6  0x00010078dd9f in execute (this=0x141e17400) at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/ira.c:4847
#7  0x00010089bbce in execute_one_pass (pass=0x141e17400) at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/passes.c:2201
#8  0x00010089be07 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x141e17400) at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/passes.c:2253
#9  0x00010089be38 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x141e16320) at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/passes.c:2254
#10 0x0001004944d1 in expand_function (node=0x142c0bd10) at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1690
#11 0x000100494d41 in output_in_order () at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1884
#12 0x000100495562 in compile () at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2127
#13 0x00010049570f in finalize_compilation_unit () at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2209
#14 0x0001000268d5 in c_write_global_declarations () at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/c/c-decl.c:10125
#15 0x0001009ab4ee in compile_file () at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:560
#16 0x0001009adcfb in do_compile () at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:1878
#17 0x0001009adead in toplev_main (argc=14, argv=0x7fff5fbffa00) at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:1954
#18 0x000100d6106b in main (argc=14, argv=0x7fff5fbffa00) at
/src/gcc-live-trunk/gcc/main.c:36