[Bug target/63661] [4.9 Regression] -O2 miscompiles with -mtune=nehalem or corei7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 Renlin Li changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #30 from Renlin Li --- 4.9 branch is fixed by r218306 trunk is fixed by r217783
[Bug target/63661] [4.9 Regression] -O2 miscompiles with -mtune=nehalem or corei7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 --- Comment #29 from renlin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: renlin Date: Wed Dec 3 11:13:50 2014 New Revision: 218306 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218306&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline gcc/ 2014-12-03 Renlin Li PR middle-end/63762 PR target/63661 * ira.c (i386ra): Update preferred class. gcc/testsuite/ 2014-12-03 Renlin Li H.J. Lu PR middle-end/63762 PR target/63661 * gcc.dg/pr63762.c: New test. * gcc.target/i386/pr63661.c: New test. Added: branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr63762.c branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr63661.c Modified: branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/ira.c branches/gcc-4_9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug target/63661] [4.9 Regression] -O2 miscompiles with -mtune=nehalem or corei7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |renlin.li at arm dot com --- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor --- In https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02502.html Renlin said he wanted to prepare the backport himself so I'll take the liberty of assigning the bug to him. Please close this bug once it hits the 4.9 branch. Thanks a lot.
[Bug target/63661] [4.9 Regression] -O2 miscompiles with -mtune=nehalem or corei7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.0 Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] -O2 |[4.9 Regression] -O2 |miscompiles with|miscompiles with |-mtune=nehalem or corei7|-mtune=nehalem or corei7 Known to fail|5.0 | --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thus fixed on the trunk so far.