[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-11-21 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška  ---
Same for Zen, thus fixed.

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-11-20 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615

--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška  ---
Yes, it fixed on Haswell, we're even slightly faster than before the
problematic revision. Tomorrow I'll measure Zen as well.

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-11-19 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615

Jan Hubicka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|2017-10-19 00:00:00 |2017-11-19
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka  ---
Not really no-op, just trying to reduce its scope.  Is the regression still
visible after all the profiling fixes?

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-10-19 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615

--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška  ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> The rev. was supposed to be a no-op?

I also guess so.

[Bug target/82615] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 453.povray ~10% performance deviation with r248863

2017-10-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82615

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|unknown |8.0

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener  ---
The rev. was supposed to be a no-op?