[Bug target/83670] [10/11/12/13 Regression] m32c ICE in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4368

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83670

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski  ---
*** Bug 109026 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/83670] [10/11/12/13 Regression] m32c ICE in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4368

[mike at mnmoran dot org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83670

Michael N. Moran  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mike at mnmoran dot org

--- Comment #10 from Michael N. Moran  ---
Created attachment 54511
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54511=edit
ICE report

This is the -freport-bug output for an m32c build on GCC 12.1.0

[Bug target/83670] [10/11/12/13 Regression] m32c ICE in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4368

[vehre at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83670

Andre Vehreschild  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #9 from Andre Vehreschild  ---
Created attachment 53966
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53966=edit
Prevent the ICE

I have no clue whether the attached patch is any good. It makes compile of
libgcc continue somewhat further, but then it fails when assigning registers
for a jump_ins.

[Bug target/83670] [10/11/12/13 Regression] m32c ICE in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4368

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83670

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.4|10.5

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.

[Bug target/83670] [10/11/12/13 Regression] m32c ICE in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4368

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83670

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed