[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 8 10:29:21 2019 New Revision: 267715 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267715=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2018-12-21 Jakub Jelinek PR target/88522 * config/i386/sse.md (*avx512pf_gatherpfsf_mask, *avx512pf_gatherpfdf_mask, *avx512pf_scatterpfsf_mask, *avx512pf_scatterpfdf_mask): Use %X5 instead of %5 for -masm=intel. (gatherq_mode): Remove mode iterator. (*avx512f_gathersi, *avx512f_gathersi_2): Use X instead of . (*avx512f_gatherdi): Use X instead of . (*avx512f_gatherdi_2, *avx512f_scattersi, *avx512f_scatterdi): Use %X5 for -masm=intel. Modified: branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/ChangeLog branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |9.0 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for GCC 9.
[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 21 16:01:53 2018 New Revision: 267327 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267327=gcc=rev Log: PR target/88522 * config/i386/sse.md (*avx512pf_gatherpfsf_mask, *avx512pf_gatherpfdf_mask, *avx512pf_scatterpfsf_mask, *avx512pf_scatterpfdf_mask): Use %X5 instead of %5 for -masm=intel. (gatherq_mode): Remove mode iterator. (*avx512f_gathersi, *avx512f_gathersi_2): Use X instead of . (*avx512f_gatherdi): Use X instead of . (*avx512f_gatherdi_2, *avx512f_scattersi, *avx512f_scatterdi): Use %X5 for -masm=intel. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45275 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45275=edit gcc9-pr88522.patch Untested fix.
[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 87471 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2018-12-17 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Yes, it does. So, shall we emit just PTR always, or have a configure check > to detect this and use PTR if assembler with this support isn't detect, > otherwise whatever it requires newly (is that whatever is normally used for > an element of the vector)? I think we should just emit PTR without assembler check.
[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes, it does. So, shall we emit just PTR always, or have a configure check to detect this and use PTR if assembler with this support isn't detect, otherwise whatever it requires newly (is that whatever is normally used for an element of the vector)?
[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> binutils 2.29 doesn't accept the syntax that 2.32 accepts and vice versa.
> Why has it changed incompatibly?
> Shouldn't new binutils accept both forms?
binutils 2.29 is wrong. Since Intel syntax is rarely used, it was decided
not to accept wrong syntax in binutils 2.32. Does
vpgatherdd xmm0{k1}, PTR [eax+xmm1*1]
vpgatherdd ymm0{k1}, PTR [eax+ymm1*1]
vpgatherdd zmm1{k1}, PTR [eax+zmm0*1]
vpgatherdq xmm0{k1}, PTR [eax+xmm1*1]
vpgatherdq ymm0{k1}, PTR [eax+xmm1*1]
vpgatherdq zmm1{k1}, PTR [eax+ymm0*1]
vpgatherqd xmm0{k1}, PTR [eax+xmm1*1]
vpgatherqd xmm0{k1}, PTR [eax+ymm1*1]
vpgatherqd ymm1{k1}, PTR [eax+zmm0*1]
vpgatherqd ymm2{k1}, PTR [edx+zmm1*1]
vpgatherqq xmm0{k1}, PTR [eax+xmm1*1]
vpgatherqq ymm0{k1}, PTR [eax+ymm1*1]
vpgatherqq zmm2{k1}, PTR [edx+zmm1*1]
work with binutils 2.29?
[Bug target/88522] Error: operand size mismatch for `vpgatherqq'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88522 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- binutils 2.29 doesn't accept the syntax that 2.32 accepts and vice versa. Why has it changed incompatibly? Shouldn't new binutils accept both forms?
