[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
--- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-08 18:05 --- I get the padding struct error on all three active branches (4.1, 4.2, trunk): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00539.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00540.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00541.html -- ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.3.0 |4.1.3 4.2.4 4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
--- Comment #8 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-08 05:59 --- The ICE mentioned in comment#7 is a dup from PR31032. I think this PR should focus on the excess padding struct warnings from the three testcases: bitfield-1.mm, bitfield-4.mm and layout-1.mm. I see these three failures on mainline gcc-4.3 on x86_64: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg00466.html but not e.g. i686, so it appears to remain lp64-specific. -- ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot ||org, mrs at apple dot com Known to fail||4.3.0 Last reconfirmed|2006-01-08 05:22:23 |2008-02-08 05:59:26 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 13:57 --- Currently, with the trunk on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, we have an ICE: Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../g++ -B/test/ gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../ /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj- c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm -nostdinc++ -I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/lib stdc++-v3/include/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 -I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 /libstdc++-v3/include -I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/test/gnu/gcc /gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ut il -fmessage-length=0 -Wpadded -Wabi -I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/../../li bobjc-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/test/gnu/gc c/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libiberty -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11 .11/./libobjc/.libs -lobjc -lm -o ./bitfield-1.exe(timeout = 300) In file included from /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:1 : /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:1: warning: padding str uct to align 'anonymous struct::anonymous' /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:1: warning: padding str uct to align 'anonymous struct::anonymous' /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:24: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:27: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:40: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:43: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:57: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:60: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:74: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:75: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:76: warning: padding st ruct size to alignment boundary /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm:113: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl with RTL' structure, have ' field_decl' in assemble_external_real, at varasm.c:2220 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 22:28 --- Also fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (32-bit). -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 22:29 --- Sorry, only obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
--- Comment #4 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2005-10-09 20:59 --- Also here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00198.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 15:45 --- Confirmed based on: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-08/msg01653.html fails only on 64bit targets. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 GCC target triplet||64bit targets Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-31 15:45:28 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
[Bug testsuite/23610] obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails with the GNU runtime
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29 03:42 --- obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails the same way: In file included from built-in:0: built-in:0: warning: padding struct to align 'anonymous struct::anonymous' built-in:0: warning: padding struct to align 'anonymous struct::anonymous' -- What|Removed |Added Summary|obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm |obj-c++.dg/bitfield-[14].mm, |fails with the GNU runtime |obj-c++.dg/layout-1.mm fails ||with the GNU runtime http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
