[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-31 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com


--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-31 17:44 ---
Fixed.


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38949



[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-26 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-26 20:34 ---
Subject: Bug 38949

Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 26 20:34:09 2009
New Revision: 143684

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=143684
Log:
2009-01-26  Danny Smith  dannysm...@users.sourceforge.net

PR testsuite/38949
* g++.dg/torture/stackalign/test-unwind.h (ASMNAME): Define.
Use instead of C name in asm statements.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/stackalign/test-unwind.h


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38949



[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-23 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com


--- Comment #1 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com  2009-01-23 
18:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=17168)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17168action=view)
Force assembler labels to match.

Now testing this fairly straightforward approach to making the names match
precisely regardless of platform's preference for an underscore prefix or no.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38949



[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-23 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net


--- Comment #2 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net  2009-01-23 
18:53 ---
There is an alternative patch at 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg00044.html
which i had forgotten about. It has been tested on i686-pc-mingw32 and
i686-pc-linux


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38949



[Bug testsuite/38949] Link failures in new stackalign tests

2009-01-23 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com


--- Comment #3 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com  2009-01-23 
19:02 ---
Right you are.  Either one should work, but I don't have any more spare time
than you for testing things on Linux right now.  It's non-critical, so I'll
keep a patch in my local tree and maybe we should set the target milestone to
4.5.0?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38949