[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2019-09-08 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
Fixed in all open branches, closing.

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2019-09-06 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe  ---
Author: iains
Date: Fri Sep  6 15:59:54 2019
New Revision: 275468

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275468=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Fix PR67958.

These tests require specific scan-asms in some cases because
of the different codegen for Dawin.  Added some explanations
too.

2019-09-06  Iain Sandoe  

Backport from mainline.
2019-05-21  Iain Sandoe  

PR testsuite/67958
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c: Adjust scan-asms for Darwin, comment
the differences.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c: Likewise.


Modified:
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c
branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2019-08-29 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe  ---
fixed for 8.4

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2019-08-29 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe  ---
Author: iains
Date: Thu Aug 29 19:32:25 2019
New Revision: 275053

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275053=gcc=rev
Log:
[Darwin, testsuite] Backport fix for PR67958.

2019-08-29  Iain Sandoe  

Backport from mainline.
2019-05-21  Iain Sandoe  

PR testsuite/67958
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c: Adjust scan-asms for Darwin, comment
the differences.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c: Likewise.


Modified:
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2019-08-04 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

Iain Sandoe  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |7.5

--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe  ---
fixed on trunk and for 9.2

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2019-08-04 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe  ---
Author: iains
Date: Sun Aug  4 10:06:33 2019
New Revision: 274060

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274060=gcc=rev
Log:
Darwin, X86, backport testsuite fix for 67958.

2019-08-04  Iain Sandoe  

Backport from mainline.
2019-05-21  Iain Sandoe  

PR testsuite/67958
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c: Adjust scan-asms for Darwin, comment
the differences.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c: Likewise.


Modified:
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c
branches/gcc-9-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2019-05-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe  ---
Author: iains
Date: Tue May 21 16:33:48 2019
New Revision: 271475

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271475=gcc=rev
Log:
darwin, testsuite - fix PR 67958

These tests require specific scan-asms in some cases because
of the different codegen for Dawin.  Added some explanations
too.

2019-05-21  Iain Sandoe  

PR testsuite/67958
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c: Adjust scan-asms for Darwin, comment
the differences.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c: Likewise.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-3.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-4.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-5.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-6.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-7.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr32219-8.c

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2018-08-20 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > > Created attachment 39731 [details]
> > > Patch fixing the failures with the patches for pr71767
> >
> > please send this patch to gcc-patches for review
> 
> This patch has never been intended to be submitted for review: it does not
> take into account comment 2.

can't that part be done separately?

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2018-05-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
> > Created attachment 39731 [details]
> > Patch fixing the failures with the patches for pr71767
>
> please send this patch to gcc-patches for review

This patch has never been intended to be submitted for review: it does not take
into account comment 2.

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2018-05-19 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Created attachment 39731 [details]
> Patch fixing the failures with the patches for pr71767

please send this patch to gcc-patches for review

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2016-10-07 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe  ---

On Darwin, PIE implies PIC (all executables that can be PIE are 'dynamic') -
(the case of mdynamic-no-pic is not combinable with pie).

so, on Darwin, the output of -1 should be the same as -2; (likewise -3 & -4; -5
& -6; -7 & -8).

So, for 1,3,5,7 the current tests could be conditionalised on ! *-*-darwin* and
the checks from 2,4,6,8 copied in and made conditional on *-*-darwin*.

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2016-10-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres  ---
Created attachment 39731
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39731=edit
Patch fixing the failures with the patches for pr71767

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

2015-11-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958

Dominique d'Humieres  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2015-11-15
 Ever confirmed|0   |1