[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2023-02-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f2c0bc57be12ca92d3e2cc74f6cca048da9ed55

commit r13-6365-g2f2c0bc57be12ca92d3e2cc74f6cca048da9ed55
Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson 
Date:   Mon Feb 27 17:22:44 2023 +0100

testsuite: Add CRIS to targets not xfailing
gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c:50,51

Reacting to a long-standing XPASS for CRIS.  Maybe better do
as https://gcc.gnu.org/PR79356#c11 suggests: xfail it for
x86 only ...except I see m68k also does not xpass.

testsuite:
PR testsuite/79356
* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c: Add CRIS to the list
of targets excluding xfail on lines 50 and 51.

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-04-10 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Apr 10 18:51:42 2017
New Revision: 246816

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246816=gcc=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/79356
* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c: Don't xfail on alpha.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-04-03 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

--- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel  ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Mon Apr  3 10:57:41 2017
New Revision: 246645

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246645=gcc=rev
Log:
Don't xfail on s390.

The attached patch removes the XFAIL in attr-alloc_size-11.c on
s390.  (PR 79356).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2017-04-03  Dominik Vogt  

PR testsuite/79356
* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c: Don't xfail on s390.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-03-29 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

--- Comment #13 from Dominik Vogt  ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg01468.html

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-03-29 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

--- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt  ---
Still XPASSes on s390 (but not s390x with -m31 or -m64).

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-03-15 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
   ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=80006

--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor  ---
Bug 80006 tracks the problem that's behind the failure discussed here.  It
looks as though it might be specific to the x86 target so perhaps rather than
listing all the targets where the xfail should not apply it might be simpler to
list x86 as the one where it does.

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-03-15 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

--- Comment #10 from Jiong Wang  ---
Author: jiwang
Date: Wed Mar 15 15:33:12 2017
New Revision: 246167

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246167=gcc=rev
Log:
[gcc, testsuite] Don't xfail on arm

PR testsuite/79356
* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c: Don't xfail on arm.


Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-03-10 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Segher Boessenkool  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|s390x-*-*, powerpc*-*-*,|s390x-*-*, powerpc*-*-*,
   |ia64-*-*, aarch64-*-*,  |ia64-*-*, aarch64-*-*,
   |sparc*-*-*  |sparc*-*-*, mips*-*-*
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
This is fixed on all identified targets now.

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-03-10 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Mar 10 15:23:06 2017
New Revision: 246032

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246032=gcc=rev
Log:
testsuite: attr-alloc_size-11.c (PR79356)

As stated in the PR (and elsewhere), this test now passes on aarch64,
ia64, mips, powerpc, sparc, and s390x.  This patch disables the xfails
for those targets.


PR testsuite/79356
* gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c: Don't xfail on aarch64, ia64, mips,
powerpc, sparc, or s390x.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-02-15 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

--- Comment #7 from Dominik Vogt  ---
Patch with all reported targets in a negative list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01006.html

Can you please double check that the xfail selectors are correct for your
targets?

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-02-10 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Segher Boessenkool  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|segher at gcc dot gnu.org  |unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
Patch withdrawn.

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-02-10 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Rainer Orth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|s390x-*-*, powerpc*-*-*,|s390x-*-*, powerpc*-*-*,
   |ia64-*-*, aarch64-*-*   |ia64-*-*, aarch64-*-*,
   ||sparc*-*-*
 CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|--- |7.0

--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth  ---
Also on SPARC as mentioned in PR tree-optimization/78775.

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-02-09 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Segher Boessenkool  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |segher at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
I have a patch.

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-02-04 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|s390x, powepc64le-linux |s390x-*-*, powepc*-*-*,
   ||ia64-*-*, aarch64-*-*
   Host|s390x, powepc64le-linux |

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Also on all other powerpc targets and ia64 and aarch64.

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-02-03 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|s390x   |s390x, powepc64le-linux
   Host|s390x   |s390x, powepc64le-linux

--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor  ---
Looks like the assertions are also XPASSing on powerpc64le-linux:
  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-02/msg00390.html

[Bug testsuite/79356] XPASS in attr-alloc_size-11.c

2017-02-03 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79356

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-02-03
  Component|c   |testsuite
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Severity|normal  |minor

--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor  ---
Confirmed. It seems that the XFAIL target could be restricted to exclude s390x.