[Bug testsuite/87958] scan-tree-dump-times vs. (foo|bar)

2024-03-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87958

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2024-03-17
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski  ---
Confirmed. 

Note scan-assembler-times most likely should have the same documentation.

Also note scan-tree-dump-times is documented under
`scan-@var{kind}-dump-times`.

[Bug testsuite/87958] scan-tree-dump-times vs. (foo|bar)

2018-11-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87958

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Ah, ok, thanks.  Perhaps we should just mention it in our scan-tree-dump-times
documentation and close then.

[Bug testsuite/87958] scan-tree-dump-times vs. (foo|bar)

2018-11-09 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87958

Alexander Monakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov  ---
I guess we are supposed to use non-capturing groups, i.e. (?:123|456)