[Bug translation/64934] The french text of --version is not proper french

2017-01-14 Thread fmarchal at perso dot be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64934

Frederic Marchal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fmarchal at perso dot be

--- Comment #3 from Frederic Marchal  ---
I partly changed the French translation as requested by this bug report but I
haven't copy/pasted the official text because I don't want the translation to
change the intent of the original message.

In particular, I haven't added a text saying that the software can be copied,
redistributed and modified. The English message should be modified if it really
is desirable to say so.

The new message is available in version 7.1-b20170101
(http://translationproject.org/PO-files/fr/gcc-7.1-b20170101.fr.po).

It was backported to version 6.2.0
(http://translationproject.org/PO-files/fr/gcc-6.2.0.fr.po).

[Bug translation/64934] The french text of --version is not proper french

2015-02-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64934

Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
  Component|c++ |translation

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
BTW: GCC translations are handled via
http://translationproject.org/team/fr.html


[Bug translation/64934] The french text of --version is not proper french

2015-02-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64934

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The link I posted was regarding the translation of the strings:

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO\n
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.\n
\n

and

This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.\n
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or \n
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.\n
\n


If one wants to change the English version, it would be a different bug
component.

Regarding the license: A simple link doesn't help as GCC uses multiple
licenses: GPL3+ for the compiler, GPL3+ with GCC exception for several
libraries, LGPL2+ or BSD license for some other libraries.