[Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91fc9610464281bb28e3c6529399fdcfb57fa812 commit r11-8696-g91fc9610464281bb28e3c6529399fdcfb57fa812 Author: Richard Biener Date: Wed Jun 16 09:49:18 2021 +0200 tree-optimization/101088 - fix SM invalidation issue When we face a sm_ord vs sm_unord for the same ref during store sequence merging we assert that the ref is already marked unsupported. But it can be that it will only be marked so during the ongoing merging so instead of asserting mark it here. Also apply some optimization to not waste resources to search for already unsupported refs. 2021-06-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/101088 * tree-ssa-loop-im.c (sm_seq_valid_bb): Only look for supported refs on edges. Do not assert same ref but different kind stores are unsuported but mark them so. (hoist_memory_references): Only look for supported refs on exits. * gcc.dg/torture/pr101088.c: New testcase. (cherry picked from commit 43fc4234ad3d9302d3460385b6fdb5e3f59b6986)
[Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||101025 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Fixed. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025 [Bug 101025] [11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
[Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43fc4234ad3d9302d3460385b6fdb5e3f59b6986 commit r12-1526-g43fc4234ad3d9302d3460385b6fdb5e3f59b6986 Author: Richard Biener Date: Wed Jun 16 09:49:18 2021 +0200 tree-optimization/101088 - fix SM invalidation issue When we face a sm_ord vs sm_unord for the same ref during store sequence merging we assert that the ref is already marked unsupported. But it can be that it will only be marked so during the ongoing merging so instead of asserting mark it here. Also apply some optimization to not waste resources to search for already unsupported refs. 2021-06-16 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/101088 * tree-ssa-loop-im.c (sm_seq_valid_bb): Only look for supported refs on edges. Do not assert same ref but different kind stores are unsuported but mark them so. (hoist_memory_references): Only look for supported refs on exits. * gcc.dg/torture/pr101088.c: New testcase.
[Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Just for the record, started with r12-1392-gb8b80b8aa3d9a7ab.
[Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2021-06-16 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |12.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Mine.
