[Bug tree-optimization/101110] [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

2021-07-16 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110

Andrew Macleod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod  ---
fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/101110] [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

2021-07-15 Thread xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110

--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao  ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #4)
> Does this still fail?  When i look at a cross compiler listing I do not see
> any differences from ranger in the listing.

Should be fixed at d48320083c9a2bdf0ddac693f9d523755b8b29ec.

Sorry for forgetting to mention the PR number in the commit.

[Bug tree-optimization/101110] [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

2021-07-15 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod  ---
Does this still fail?  When i look at a cross compiler listing I do not see any
differences from ranger in the listing.

[Bug tree-optimization/101110] [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

2021-06-21 Thread xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110

Xi Ruoyao  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang

--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao  ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #2)
> I think the patch for PR 101014 resolves this testcase...  Let me know if
> this is fixed on trunk now.

This is still failing on mips64el.  And there is really an UB (signed overflow)
in the test:

950704-1.c:9:5: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -9223372036854775808 +
-9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in type 'long long int'

maybe we should add -fwrapv for this test.

[Bug tree-optimization/101110] [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

2021-06-18 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod  ---
I think the patch for PR 101014 resolves this testcase...  Let me know if this
is fixed on trunk now.

[Bug tree-optimization/101110] [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

2021-06-18 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110

Christophe Lyon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
 Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|powerpc64-linux-gnu,
   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu arm

--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon  ---
Seen on some arm configurations when generating thumb code too.

[Bug tree-optimization/101110] [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails after r12-1546

2021-06-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|other   |tree-optimization
   Target Milestone|--- |12.0