[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 --- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely --- I've pushed the workaround from comment 17 to the gcc-12 branch.
[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 --- Comment #28 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:636795a6dfc17ead7b22b9f76b0fc47bdb9d357d commit r12-9716-g636795a6dfc17ead7b22b9f76b0fc47bdb9d357d Author: Jason Merrill Date: Thu Aug 18 23:53:16 2022 -0400 libstdc++: avoid bogus -Wrestrict [PR105651] PR tree-optimization/105651 libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/bits/basic_string.tcc (_M_replace): Add an assert to avoid -Wrestrict false positive.
[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|12.3|12.4 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- GCC 12.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 12.4.
[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvb at cyberscience dot com --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 105545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de --- Comment #25 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 109563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Jonny Grant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jg at jguk dot org --- Comment #24 from Jonny Grant --- Hi, Glad it is fixed in trunk. I saw this fail in 12.2 - test case below. #include typedef struct a_bc { std::string a; std::string b; } a_t; void f() { a_t c; c.a = " sdfsdf fsdfsdf fdfsfdsdf "; // seems to need this long string to reproduce, down to 8 bytes it didn't c.b = "E"; }
[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
[Bug tree-optimization/105651] [12 Regression] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string and operator+ at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] bogus|[12 Regression] bogus "may |"may overlap" memcpy|overlap" memcpy warning |warning with std::string|with std::string and |and operator+ at -O3|operator+ at -O3 Known to work||13.0 Known to fail|13.0| --- Comment #23 from Richard Biener --- The testcase from comment#5 is fixed on trunk, the preprocessed source of course not as the workaround was in the library. Still, fixed in GCC 13.